Re: New syscalls (was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the y2038 tree (now block and tip trees))
From: Christian Brauner
Date: Tue Mar 12 2019 - 04:48:23 EST
On March 12, 2019 9:31:33 AM GMT+01:00, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:43 PM Christian Brauner
><christian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:38:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 9:36 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
><geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Shall each architcture maintainer take care of this hxxself, or
>will
>> > > this be done in
>> > > a coordinated way?
>> >
>> > I was planning to send a patch for all architectures this time
>> > (after all three sets are merged, which is now), and ask future
>>
>> Just to clarify, are you referring to your sets? I think Linus hasn't
>> gotten around to reviewing the PR for pidfd_send_signal() yet. :)
>
>Ah, I thought he had already merged both, the confusion was on
>my end.
I think I'll do a GIT PULL RESEND later today since I sent the original pr last Tuesday.
Christian
>
> Arnd