Re: [PATCH v7 01/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:05:40AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> +static inline unsigned int uclamp_bucket_id(unsigned int clamp_value)
> +{
> +	return clamp_value / UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int uclamp_bucket_value(unsigned int clamp_value)
> +{
> +	return UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA * uclamp_bucket_id(clamp_value);

	return clamp_value - (clamp_value % UCLAMP_BUCKET_DELTA);

might generate better code; just a single division, instead of a div and
mult.

> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int uclamp_none(int clamp_id)
> +{
> +	if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MIN)
> +		return 0;
> +	return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void uclamp_rq_update(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
> +{
> +	struct uclamp_bucket *bucket = rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket;
> +	unsigned int max_value = uclamp_none(clamp_id);
> +	unsigned int bucket_id;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Both min and max clamps are MAX aggregated, thus the topmost
> +	 * bucket with some tasks defines the rq's clamp value.
> +	 */
> +	bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS;
> +	do {
> +		--bucket_id;
> +		if (!rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket[bucket_id].tasks)
> +			continue;
> +		max_value = bucket[bucket_id].value;
> +		break;

If you flip the if condition the code will be nicer.

> +	} while (bucket_id);

But you can also use a for loop:

	for (i = UCLAMP_BUCKETS-1; i>=0; i--) {
		if (rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket[i].tasks) {
			max_value = bucket[i].value;
			break;
		}
	}

> +	WRITE_ONCE(rq->uclamp[clamp_id].value, max_value);
> +}