[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 56/60] bnxt_en: Fix typo in firmware message timeout logic.

[Sasha Levin]

From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 67681d02aaa1db9044a16df4ca9c77cde1221a3e ]

The logic that polls for the firmware message response uses a shorter
sleep interval for the first few passes.  But there was a typo so it
was using the wrong counter (larger counter) for these short sleep
passes.  The result is a slightly shorter timeout period for these
firmware messages than intended.  Fix it by using the proper counter.

Fixes: 9751e8e71487 ("bnxt_en: reduce timeout on initial HWRM calls")
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 29b068b81e2a..938ea8ada0da 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -3844,7 +3844,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_do_send_msg(struct bnxt *bp, void *msg, u32 msg_len,
 			if (len)
 				break;
 			/* on first few passes, just barely sleep */
-			if (i < DFLT_HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT)
+			if (i < HWRM_SHORT_TIMEOUT_COUNTER)
 				usleep_range(HWRM_SHORT_MIN_TIMEOUT,
 					     HWRM_SHORT_MAX_TIMEOUT);
 			else
-- 
2.19.1