Re: [PATCH 1/2] firewire: annotate implicit fall through
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Date: Wed Mar 13 2019 - 16:39:16 EST
Mathieu,
On 3/13/19 3:28 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> ping ?
>
I have sent the following patch to address all these warnings in
firewire:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1040737/
and, as this is being ignored, I'll add it to my tree for 5.2.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:42 PM Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough and
>> this place in the code produced a warning (W=1).
>>
>> In this particular case rewrote the comment to start with the string "fall
>> through", so as to match the regular expression expected by GCC.
>>
>> This commit remove the following warning:
>>
>> drivers/firewire/core-iso.c:308:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/firewire/core-iso.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firewire/core-iso.c b/drivers/firewire/core-iso.c
>> index 35e784cffc23..d2d50bda5a5f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firewire/core-iso.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firewire/core-iso.c
>> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int manage_channel(struct fw_card *card, int irm_id, int generation,
>> if ((data[0] & bit) == (data[1] & bit))
>> continue;
>>
>> - /* 1394-1995 IRM, fall through to retry. */
>> + /* fall through - 1394-1995 IRM to retry. */
>> default:
>> if (retry) {
>> retry--;
>> --
>> 2.19.2
>>