Re: [PATCH 0/7] cpufreq: Call transition notifier only once for each policy
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Mar 14 2019 - 07:03:25 EST
On 14-03-19, 11:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:16 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But some of them need to combine the new cpumask with
> cpu_online_mask() to get what would be policy->cpus effectively. That
> would be avoidable if you passed the policy pointer to them.
Right, that's what I also thought after your previous email. Will pass
the policy pointer instead.
--
viresh