Re: [PATCH] spi: mediatek: Attempt to address style issues in spi-mt7621.c

[Dan Carpenter]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:13:15PM +0100, Armando Miraglia wrote:
> My answers are in-line below. BTW bare with me as this is my attempt to get my
> feet wet in how to contribute to the linux kernel for my own pleasure and
> interest :)
> 

No problem at all.

> Is there an explicit intent to deprecate Lindent in favor of checkpatch.pl
> --fix? If one would like to contribute to fixing the tooling for linting which
> of the two would be the right target for such an effort?
> 

I've added Jean to the CC list because he worked on Lindent a few
years ago.  I really think we should just delete Lindent.  I haven't
used the checkpatch.pl --fix option but Joe Perches has good style.

> > >  static inline struct mt7621_spi *spidev_to_mt7621_spi(struct spi_device *spi)
> > > @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static int mt7621_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> > >  	struct mt7621_spi *rs = spidev_to_mt7621_spi(spi);
> > >  
> > >  	if ((spi->max_speed_hz == 0) ||
> > > -		(spi->max_speed_hz > (rs->sys_freq / 2)))
> > > +	    (spi->max_speed_hz > (rs->sys_freq / 2)))
> > 
> > Yeah.  Lindent is correct here.
> 
> Funny enough, this is something I adjusted manually :)
> 

:)  Good.

> I have a process question here: to post a change for the only accepted change I
> have in this patch should I send out a new patch?
> 

Yeah.  If you want.  Google for how to send a v2 patch.

regards,
dan carpenter