Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iio:potentiostat:lmp91000: invert if statement

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 18:46:15 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri,  8 Mar 2019 16:46:54 -0300
> Anderson Reis <andersonreisrosa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Invert if statement arms in line 214, in order to make the code cleaner,
> > solve these checkpatch.pl CHECKs:
> > 
> > - lmp9100.c:214: CHECK: braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement
> > - lmp9100.c:216: CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else statement
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Anderson Reis <andersonreisrosa@xxxxxxxxx>  
> Applied.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/potentiostat/lmp91000.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/potentiostat/lmp91000.c b/drivers/iio/potentiostat/lmp91000.c
> > index c45cfb632649..1de17924e154 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/potentiostat/lmp91000.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/potentiostat/lmp91000.c
> > @@ -211,12 +211,11 @@ static int lmp91000_read_config(struct lmp91000_data *data)
> >  
> >  	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,tia-gain-ohm", &val);
> >  	if (ret) {
> > -		if (of_property_read_bool(np, "ti,external-tia-resistor"))
> > -			val = 0;
> > -		else {
> > +		if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "ti,external-tia-resistor"))
Spoke too soon. You didn't build test this.  Missing {

Fixed up.

Jonathan

> >  			dev_err(dev, "no ti,tia-gain-ohm defined");
> >  			return ret;
> >  		}
> > +		val = 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	ret = -EINVAL;  
>