[PATCH 22/25] objtool: Fix sibling call detection

[Peter Zijlstra]

It turned out that we failed to detect some sibling calls;
specifically those without relocation records; like:

$ ./objdump-func.sh defconfig-build/mm/kasan/generic.o __asan_loadN
0000 0000000000000840 <__asan_loadN>:
0000  840:      48 8b 0c 24             mov    (%rsp),%rcx
0004  844:      31 d2                   xor    %edx,%edx
0006  846:      e9 45 fe ff ff          jmpq   690 <check_memory_region>

So extend the cross-function jump to also consider those that are not
between known (or newly detected) parent/child functions, as
sibling-cals when they jump to the start of the function.

The second part of that condition is to deal with random jumps to the
middle of other function, as can be found in
arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S for example.

This then (with later patches applied) makes the above recognise the
sibling call:

mm/kasan/generic.o: warning: objtool: __asan_loadN()+0x6: call to check_memory_region() with UACCESS enabled

Also make sure to set insn->call_dest for sibling calls so we can know
who we're calling. This is useful information when printing validation
warnings later.


Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/objtool/check.c |   86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -515,7 +515,8 @@ static int add_jump_destinations(struct
 			continue;
 		} else {
 			/* sibling call */
-			insn->jump_dest = 0;
+			insn->call_dest = rela->sym;
+			insn->jump_dest = NULL;
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -537,25 +538,38 @@ static int add_jump_destinations(struct
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * For GCC 8+, create parent/child links for any cold
-		 * subfunctions.  This is _mostly_ redundant with a similar
-		 * initialization in read_symbols().
-		 *
-		 * If a function has aliases, we want the *first* such function
-		 * in the symbol table to be the subfunction's parent.  In that
-		 * case we overwrite the initialization done in read_symbols().
-		 *
-		 * However this code can't completely replace the
-		 * read_symbols() code because this doesn't detect the case
-		 * where the parent function's only reference to a subfunction
-		 * is through a switch table.
+		 * Cross-function jump.
 		 */
 		if (insn->func && insn->jump_dest->func &&
-		    insn->func != insn->jump_dest->func &&
-		    !strstr(insn->func->name, ".cold.") &&
-		    strstr(insn->jump_dest->func->name, ".cold.")) {
-			insn->func->cfunc = insn->jump_dest->func;
-			insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc = insn->func;
+		    insn->func != insn->jump_dest->func) {
+
+			/*
+			 * For GCC 8+, create parent/child links for any cold
+			 * subfunctions.  This is _mostly_ redundant with a
+			 * similar initialization in read_symbols().
+			 *
+			 * If a function has aliases, we want the *first* such
+			 * function in the symbol table to be the subfunction's
+			 * parent.  In that case we overwrite the
+			 * initialization done in read_symbols().
+			 *
+			 * However this code can't completely replace the
+			 * read_symbols() code because this doesn't detect the
+			 * case where the parent function's only reference to a
+			 * subfunction is through a switch table.
+			 */
+			if (!strstr(insn->func->name, ".cold.") &&
+			    strstr(insn->jump_dest->func->name, ".cold.")) {
+				insn->func->cfunc = insn->jump_dest->func;
+				insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc = insn->func;
+
+			} else if (insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc != insn->func->pfunc &&
+				   insn->jump_dest->offset == insn->jump_dest->func->offset) {
+
+				/* sibling class */
+				insn->call_dest = insn->jump_dest->func;
+				insn->jump_dest = NULL;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -1785,6 +1799,17 @@ static bool insn_state_match(struct inst
 	return false;
 }
 
+static int validate_sibling_call(struct instruction *insn, struct insn_state *state)
+{
+	if (has_modified_stack_frame(state)) {
+		WARN_FUNC("sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame",
+				insn->sec, insn->offset);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Follow the branch starting at the given instruction, and recursively follow
  * any other branches (jumps).  Meanwhile, track the frame pointer state at
@@ -1935,9 +1960,14 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtoo
 
 		case INSN_JUMP_CONDITIONAL:
 		case INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL:
-			if (insn->jump_dest &&
-			    (!func || !insn->jump_dest->func ||
-			     insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc == func)) {
+			if (func && !insn->jump_dest) {
+				ret = validate_sibling_call(insn, &state);
+				if (ret)
+					return ret;
+
+			} else if (insn->jump_dest &&
+				   (!func || !insn->jump_dest->func ||
+				    insn->jump_dest->func->pfunc == func)) {
 				ret = validate_branch(file, insn->jump_dest,
 						      state);
 				if (ret) {
@@ -1945,11 +1975,6 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtoo
 						BT_FUNC("(branch)", insn);
 					return ret;
 				}
-
-			} else if (func && has_modified_stack_frame(&state)) {
-				WARN_FUNC("sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame",
-					  sec, insn->offset);
-				return 1;
 			}
 
 			if (insn->type == INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL)
@@ -1958,11 +1983,10 @@ static int validate_branch(struct objtoo
 			break;
 
 		case INSN_JUMP_DYNAMIC:
-			if (func && list_empty(&insn->alts) &&
-			    has_modified_stack_frame(&state)) {
-				WARN_FUNC("sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame",
-					  sec, insn->offset);
-				return 1;
+			if (func && list_empty(&insn->alts)) {
+				ret = validate_sibling_call(insn, &state);
+				if (ret)
+					return ret;
 			}
 
 			return 0;