On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 02:27:11AM -0500, Kangjie Lu wrote:I didn't see what resources require release in this
In case create_singlethread_workqueue fails, the fix notifiesYou only ever use unlikely/likely if you can actually measure the
callers the error to avoid potential NULL pointer dereferences.
Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c
index 934584f0a20a..6d5b532b03f8 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/u132-hcd.c
@@ -3203,6 +3203,8 @@ static int __init u132_hcd_init(void)
return -ENODEV;
printk(KERN_INFO "driver %s\n", hcd_name);
workqueue = create_singlethread_workqueue("u132");
+ if (unlikely(!workqueue))
difference with and without it. For stuff like this, it is not needed
at all, and in fact, the compiler and CPU already know this type of
thing, so it is going to be faster without it.
And are you sure you properly unwound from anything that was
created/initialized above these lines?
thanks,
greg k-h