Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Mar 19 2019 - 14:32:18 EST

Next message: Dan Murphy: "[PATCH] net: phy: Add DP83825I to the DP83822 driver"
Previous message: Martin K. Petersen: "Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: clean up various indentation issues"
In reply to: Andrey Konovalov: "[PATCH v12 02/13] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr"
Next in thread: Catalin Marinas: "Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:17:32 +0100 Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> === Notes
>
> This patchset is meant to be merged together with "arm64 relaxed ABI" [3].

What does this mean, precisely? That neither series is useful without
the other? That either patchset will break things without the other?

Only a small fraction of these patches carry evidence of having been
reviewed. Fixable?

Which maintainer tree would be appropriate for carrying these patches?

Next message: Dan Murphy: "[PATCH] net: phy: Add DP83825I to the DP83822 driver"
Previous message: Martin K. Petersen: "Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: clean up various indentation issues"
In reply to: Andrey Konovalov: "[PATCH v12 02/13] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr"
Next in thread: Catalin Marinas: "Re: [PATCH v12 00/13] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]