Re: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in xfrm_alloc_userspi

From: Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Mar 19 2019 - 20:55:32 EST



On 2019/3/20 0:23, Eric Dumazet wrote:
CC Su Yanjun

On 03/19/2019 09:02 AM, syzbot wrote:
Hello,

syzbot found the following crash on:

HEAD commit:ÂÂÂ b9998194 Add linux-next specific files for 20190318
git tree:ÂÂÂÂÂÂ linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17a2e24d200000
kernel config:Â https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=59cd5d43b5df6955
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=59752237f7ab21c3f3c3
compiler:ÂÂÂÂÂÂ gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
syz repro:ÂÂÂÂÂ https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=14e70cb3200000
C reproducer:ÂÂ https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17292127200000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+59752237f7ab21c3f3c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.1.0-rc1-next-20190318 #5 Not tainted
-----------------------------
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1080 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:


rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by syz-executor085/7946:
Â#0: 00000000a55031b5 (&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex){+.+.}, at: xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x61/0x90 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:2691

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 7946 Comm: syz-executor085 Not tainted 5.1.0-rc1-next-20190318 #5
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
Â__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
Âdump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
Âlockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x153/0x15d kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5162
Âxfrm_nlmsg_unicast net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1080 [inline]
Âxfrm_alloc_userspi+0x7d5/0xa80 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1356
Âxfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x458/0x770 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:2684
Ânetlink_rcv_skb+0x17a/0x460 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2485
Âxfrm_netlink_rcv+0x70/0x90 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:2692
Ânetlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1310 [inline]
Ânetlink_unicast+0x536/0x720 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1336
Ânetlink_sendmsg+0x8ae/0xd70 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1925
Âsock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:651 [inline]
Âsock_sendmsg+0xdd/0x130 net/socket.c:661
Â___sys_sendmsg+0x806/0x930 net/socket.c:2260
Â__sys_sendmsg+0x105/0x1d0 net/socket.c:2298
Â__do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2307 [inline]
Â__se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2305 [inline]
Â__x64_sys_sendmsg+0x78/0xb0 net/socket.c:2305
Âdo_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
Âentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x440499
Code: 18 89 d0 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 fb 13 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007ffcf12caf08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004002c8 RCX: 0000000000440499
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000200006c0 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00000000006ca018 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000004002c8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000040


---
This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bug-status-tracking for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches

IÂ got it.

Thanks