Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/7] tools: bpftool: implement map exec command
From: Quentin Monnet
Date: Wed Mar 20 2019 - 15:01:07 EST
2019-03-20 18:33 UTC+0100 ~ Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@xxxxxxxxx>
> From: Alban Crequy <alban@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The map exec commands allows to open an existing map and pass the file
> descriptor to a child process. This enables applications to use an
> existing BPF map even when they don't support bpffs.
>
> Example of usage:
> # bpftool map exec pinned /sys/fs/bpf/foo fd 99 cmd -- readlink /proc/self/fd/99
> anon_inode:bpf-map
>
> Documentation and bash completion updated as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <alban@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst | 11 ++++
> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 22 +++++++-
> tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst
> index b685641bfd74..dfd8352fa453 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-map.rst
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ MAP COMMANDS
> | **bpftool** **map getnext** *MAP* [**key** *DATA*]
> | **bpftool** **map delete** *MAP* **key** *DATA*
> | **bpftool** **map pin** *MAP* *FILE*
> +| **bpftool** **map exec** *MAP* **fd** *FD* **cmd** -- *CMD*
> | **bpftool** **map event_pipe** *MAP* [**cpu** *N* **index** *M*]
> | **bpftool** **map peek** *MAP*
> | **bpftool** **map push** *MAP* **value** *VALUE*
> @@ -101,6 +102,10 @@ DESCRIPTION
> contain a dot character ('.'), which is reserved for future
> extensions of *bpffs*.
>
> + **bpftool map exec** *MAP* **fd** *FD* **cmd** -- *CMD*
> + Load map and exec an external command, passing the file
> + descriptor.
> +
Please use tabs for indent.
Could you please add a line to explain that the process spawned get the
the link to the map in the file descriptor passed as *FD*? I'm being
pedantic, I know it's not that hard to understand with the examples,
just trying to make things as clear as possible for users reading the page.
I have nothing against the double dash in the examples or the commit
log, but putting it in the description in the command itself makes it
look like it is some kind of mandatory syntax. Would you consider
removing the occurrences above?
We don't really "exec" the map... Just thinking... Would another keyword
like "pass" or "passfd" be more relevant?
> **bpftool** **map event_pipe** *MAP* [**cpu** *N* **index** *M*]
> Read events from a BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY map.
>
> @@ -254,6 +259,12 @@ would be lost as soon as bpftool exits).
> key: 00 00 00 00 value: 22 02 00 00
> Found 1 element
>
> +**# bpftool map exec pinned /sys/fs/bpf/foo fd 99 cmd -- readlink /proc/self/fd/99**
> +
> +::
> +
> + anon_inode:bpf-map
> +
> SEE ALSO
> ========
> **bpf**\ (2),
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> index 9e37de8bb227..63cd53c4d3a7 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> @@ -583,6 +583,26 @@ _bpftool()
> fi
> return 0
> ;;
> + exec)
> + case $prev in
> + $command)
> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W "$MAP_TYPE" -- "$cur" ) )
> + return 0
> + ;;
> + fd)
> + return 0
> + ;;
> + cmd)
> + COMPREPLY=( $(compgen -c -- "$cur" ) )
> + return 0
> + ;;
> + *)
> + _bpftool_once_attr 'fd'
> + _bpftool_once_attr 'cmd'
> + return 0
> + ;;
> + esac
> + ;;
> event_pipe)
> case $prev in
> $command)
> @@ -610,7 +630,7 @@ _bpftool()
> [[ $prev == $object ]] && \
> COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W 'delete dump getnext help \
> lookup pin event_pipe show list update create \
> - peek push enqueue pop dequeue' -- \
> + peek push enqueue pop dequeue exec' -- \
> "$cur" ) )
> ;;
> esac
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> index a576f2a019be..768497364cee 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/map.c
> @@ -883,6 +883,58 @@ static int do_update(int argc, char **argv)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int do_exec(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + struct bpf_map_info info = {};
> + __u32 len = sizeof(info);
> + int fd, ret;
> + __u32 outfd = 0;
Reverse-Christmas tree.
> +
> + if (argc < 2)
> + usage();
> +
> + fd = map_parse_fd_and_info(&argc, &argv, &info, &len);
> + if (fd < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + while (argc) {
> + if (is_prefix(*argv, "fd")) {
> + if (parse_u32_arg(&argc, &argv, &outfd,
> + "out fd"))
> + return -1;
> + } else if (is_prefix(*argv, "cmd")){
> + NEXT_ARG();
> + if (!REQ_ARGS(1))
> + return -1;
> +
> + break;
> + } else {
> + p_err("unknown arg %s", *argv);
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (outfd == 0) {
> + p_err("invalid fd");
> + return -1;
> + }
> + if (*argv == NULL) {
> + p_err("empty command");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> +
Spurious blank line.
> + ret = dup2(fd, (int)outfd);
> + if (ret == -1) {
> + p_err("dup2 failed: %s", strerror(errno));
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + execvp(argv[0], argv);
> + p_err("execvp failed: %s", strerror(errno));
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> static void print_key_value(struct bpf_map_info *info, void *key,
> void *value)
> {
> @@ -1355,6 +1407,7 @@ static const struct cmd cmds[] = {
> { "enqueue", do_update },
> { "pop", do_pop_dequeue },
> { "dequeue", do_pop_dequeue },
> + { "exec", do_exec },
> { 0 }
> };
>
>
Please also add the new command in the interactive help (do_help()).
By the way, I like this new command a lot!