Re: [PATCH] ELAN touchpad i2c_hid bugs fix
From: Kai-Heng Feng
Date: Thu Mar 21 2019 - 00:08:34 EST
at 01:18, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:55 PM Kai-Heng Feng
<kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
at 23:39, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/20/19 3:37 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
Benjamin, what I find interesting here is that the BOGUS_IRQ quirk
is also used on Elan devices, I suspect that these Elan devices
likely also need the I2C_HID_QUIRK_FORCE_TRIGGER_FALLING quirk
and then they probably will no longer need the bogus IRQ flag,
if you know about bugreports with an acpidump for any of the devices
needing the bogus IRQ quirk, then I (or you) can check how the IRQ is
declared there, I suspect it will be declared as level-low, just like
with the laptop this patch was written for. And it probably need to
be edge-falling instead of level-low just like this case.
First, Iâve already tried using IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, unfortunately it
doesnât solve the issue for me.
I talked to Elan once, and they confirm the correct IRQ trigger is level
low. So forcing falling trigger may break other platforms.
As far as I understood Vladislav the quirk he got from Elan as well.
Ok, then this is really weird.
Recently we found that Elan touchpad doesnât like GpioInt() from its _CRS.
Once the Interrupt() is used instead, the issue goes away.
IIRC i2c core tries to get interrupt from Interrupt() resource and
then falls back to GpioInt().
See i2c_acpi_get_info() and i2c_device_probe().
Hereâs its ASL:
Scope (\_SB.PCI0.I2C4)
{
Device (TPD0)
{
Name (_ADR, One) // _ADR: Address
Name (_HID, "DELL08AE") // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_CID, "PNP0C50" /* HID Protocol Device (I2C bus) */) // _CID: Compatible ID
Name (_UID, One) // _UID: Unique ID
Name (_S0W, 0x04) // _S0W: S0 Device Wake State
Name (SBFB, ResourceTemplate ()
{
I2cSerialBusV2 (0x002C, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C4",
0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
)
})
Name (SBFG, ResourceTemplate ()
{
GpioInt (Level, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, PullUp, 0x0000,
"\\_SB.GPO1", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x0012
}
})
Name (SBFI, ResourceTemplate ()
{
Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, ExclusiveAndWake, ,, )
{
0x0000003C,
}
})
Method (_INI, 0, NotSerialized) // _INI: Initialize
{
}
Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized) // _STA: Status
{
If ((TCPD == One))
{
Return (0x0F)
}
Return (Zero)
}
Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
{
If ((OSYS < 0x07DC))
{
Return (SBFI) /* \_SB_.PCI0.I2C4.TPD0.SBFI */
}
Return (ConcatenateResTemplate (SBFB, SBFG))
}
Method (_DSM, 4, NotSerialized) // _DSM: Device-Specific Method
{
If ((Arg0 == ToUUID ("3cdff6f7-4267-4555-ad05-b30a3d8938de") /* HID I2C Device */))
{
If ((Arg2 == Zero))
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Return (Buffer (One)
{
0x03 // .
})
}
Else
{
Return (Buffer (One)
{
0x00 // .
})
}
}
ElseIf ((Arg2 == One))
{
Return (0x20)
}
Else
{
Return (Buffer (One)
{
0x00 // .
})
}
}
ElseIf ((Arg0 == ToUUID ("ef87eb82-f951-46da-84ec-14871ac6f84b")))
{
If ((Arg2 == Zero))
{
If ((Arg1 == One))
{
Return (Buffer (One)
{
0x03 // .
})
}
}
If ((Arg2 == One))
{
Return (ConcatenateResTemplate (SBFB, SBFG))
}
Return (Buffer (One)
{
0x00 // .
})
}
}
Else
{
Return (Buffer (One)
{
0x00 // .
})
}
}
}
}
Change SBFG to SBFI in its _CRS can workaround the issue.
Is ASL in this form possible to do the flow you described?
Kai-Heng
But I am not sure how to patch its DSDT/SSDT in i2c-hid.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko