Re: [PATCH v5 10/14] soc: mediatek: Add multiple step bus protection control

From: Nicolas Boichat
Date: Thu Mar 21 2019 - 02:01:41 EST

Next message: Christophe Leroy: "Re: [PATCH] powerpc/highmem: change BUG_ON() to WARN_ON()"
Previous message: Vaishali Thakkar: "Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] soc: qcom: socinfo: Expose custom attributes"
In reply to: Weiyi Lu: "[PATCH v5 10/14] soc: mediatek: Add multiple step bus protection control"
Next in thread: Weiyi Lu: "[PATCH v5 09/14] soc: mediatek: Add basic_clk_name to scp_power_data"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:02 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Both MT8183 & MT6765 have more control steps of bus protection
> than previous project. And there add more bus protection registers
> reside at infracfg & smi-common. Also add new APIs for multiple
> step bus protection control with more customize arguments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 24 ++++++
> include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h | 39 ++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> index 64ce5eeaba32..b9dbad6b12f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ) += mtk-cmdq-helper.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_INFRACFG) += mtk-infracfg.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_INFRACFG) += mtk-infracfg.o mtk-scpsys-ext.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP) += mtk-pmic-wrap.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_SCPSYS) += mtk-scpsys.o
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f630edb2f65d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys-ext.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc.
> + * Author: Owen Chen <Owen.Chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h>
> +
> +#define MTK_POLL_DELAY_US 10
> +#define MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT USEC_PER_SEC
> +
> +static int set_bus_protection(struct regmap *map, u32 mask, u32 ack_mask,
> + u32 reg_set, u32 reg_sta, u32 reg_en)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + if (reg_set)
> + regmap_write(map, reg_set, mask);
> + else
> + regmap_update_bits(map, reg_en, mask, mask);
> +
> + return regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, reg_sta,
> + val, (val & ack_mask) == ack_mask,
> + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> +}
> +
> +static int clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *map, u32 mask, u32 ack_mask,
> + u32 reg_clr, u32 reg_sta, u32 reg_en)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + if (reg_clr)
> + regmap_write(map, reg_clr, mask);
> + else
> + regmap_update_bits(map, reg_en, mask, 0);
> +
> + return regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, reg_sta,
> + val, !(val & ack_mask),
> + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> +}
> +
> +int mtk_scpsys_ext_set_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table,
> + struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_STEPS && bp_table[i].mask; i++) {
> + struct regmap *map;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (bp_table[i].type == IFR_TYPE)
> + map = infracfg;
> + else if (bp_table[i].type == SMI_TYPE)
> + map = smi_common;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = set_bus_protection(map,
> + bp_table[i].mask, bp_table[i].mask,
> + bp_table[i].set_ofs, bp_table[i].sta_ofs,
> + bp_table[i].en_ofs);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;

Should you undo the rest of the operations and clear bus protection on
the ones that were already enabled?

> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int mtk_scpsys_ext_clear_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table,
> + struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = MAX_STEPS - 1; i >= 0; i--) {

So when you set protection, you stop at the first bp_table[i].mask ==
0, but when you clear it, you call clear_bus_protection for those, as
well. You should just skip over the ones when bp_table[i].mask == 0?

e.g.
if (!bp_table[i].mask)
continue;

> + struct regmap *map;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (bp_table[i].type == IFR_TYPE)
> + map = infracfg;
> + else if (bp_table[i].type == SMI_TYPE)
> + map = smi_common;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = clear_bus_protection(map,
> + bp_table[i].mask, bp_table[i].clr_ack_mask,
> + bp_table[i].clr_ofs, bp_table[i].sta_ofs,
> + bp_table[i].en_ofs);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;

Similar question, is it ok to just abort? Or should you try to clear
the protection on all others, too?

> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> index c6360de4e41e..181bf7bce591 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h>
>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/mt2701-power.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/mt2712-power.h>
> @@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ static const char * const clk_names[] = {
> * @basic_clk_name: provide the same purpose with field "clk_id"
> * by declaring basic clock prefix name rather than clk_id.
> * @caps: The flag for active wake-up action.
> + * @bp_table: The mask table for multiple step bus protection.
> */
> struct scp_domain_data {
> const char *name;
> @@ -132,6 +134,7 @@ struct scp_domain_data {
> enum clk_id clk_id[MAX_CLKS];
> const char *basic_clk_name[MAX_CLKS];
> u8 caps;
> + struct bus_prot bp_table[MAX_STEPS];
> };
>
> struct scp;
> @@ -155,6 +158,7 @@ struct scp {
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *base;
> struct regmap *infracfg;
> + struct regmap *smi_common;
> struct scp_ctrl_reg ctrl_reg;
> bool bus_prot_reg_update;
> };
> @@ -291,6 +295,10 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> ret = mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> scp->bus_prot_reg_update);
> + } else if (scpd->data->bp_table[0].mask) {
> + ret = mtk_scpsys_ext_set_bus_protection(scpd->data->bp_table,
> + scp->infracfg,
> + scp->smi_common);
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -305,6 +313,11 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> scp->bus_prot_reg_update);
> + } else if (scpd->data->bp_table[0].mask) {
> + ret = mtk_scpsys_ext_clear_bus_protection(
> + scpd->data->bp_table,
> + scp->infracfg,
> + scp->smi_common);
> }
>
> return ret;
> @@ -475,6 +488,17 @@ static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return ERR_CAST(scp->infracfg);
> }
>
> + scp->smi_common = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + "smi_comm");
> +
> + if (scp->smi_common == ERR_PTR(-ENODEV)) {
> + scp->smi_common = NULL;
> + } else if (IS_ERR(scp->smi_common)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot find smi_common controller: %ld\n",
> + PTR_ERR(scp->smi_common));
> + return ERR_CAST(scp->smi_common);
> + }
> +
> for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> struct scp_domain *scpd = &scp->domains[i];
> const struct scp_domain_data *data = &scp_domain_data[i];
> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d0ed295c88a7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/scpsys-ext.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __SOC_MEDIATEK_SCPSYS_EXT_H
> +#define __SOC_MEDIATEK_SCPSYS_EXT_H
> +
> +#define MAX_STEPS 4
> +
> +#define BUS_PROT(_type, _set_ofs, _clr_ofs, \
> + _en_ofs, _sta_ofs, _mask, _clr_ack_mask) { \
> + .type = _type, \
> + .set_ofs = _set_ofs, \
> + .clr_ofs = _clr_ofs, \
> + .en_ofs = _en_ofs, \
> + .sta_ofs = _sta_ofs, \
> + .mask = _mask, \
> + .clr_ack_mask = _clr_ack_mask, \
> + }
> +
> +enum regmap_type {

Maybe add INVALID_TYPE = 0, so that you can skip over those when
looping over them, instead of checking if mask is 0?

> + IFR_TYPE,
> + SMI_TYPE,
> + MAX_REGMAP_TYPE,

This is not used, right? Do you really need it?

> +};
> +
> +struct bus_prot {
> + enum regmap_type type;
> + u32 set_ofs;
> + u32 clr_ofs;
> + u32 en_ofs;
> + u32 sta_ofs;
> + u32 mask;
> + u32 clr_ack_mask;
> +};
> +
> +int mtk_scpsys_ext_set_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table,
> + struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common);
> +int mtk_scpsys_ext_clear_bus_protection(const struct bus_prot *bp_table,
> + struct regmap *infracfg, struct regmap *smi_common);
> +
> +#endif /* __SOC_MEDIATEK_SCPSYS_EXT_H */
> --
> 2.18.0
>

Next message: Christophe Leroy: "Re: [PATCH] powerpc/highmem: change BUG_ON() to WARN_ON()"
Previous message: Vaishali Thakkar: "Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] soc: qcom: socinfo: Expose custom attributes"
In reply to: Weiyi Lu: "[PATCH v5 10/14] soc: mediatek: Add multiple step bus protection control"
Next in thread: Weiyi Lu: "[PATCH v5 09/14] soc: mediatek: Add basic_clk_name to scp_power_data"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]