[PATCH 4.19 218/280] jbd2: fix compile warning when using JBUFFER_TRACE

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 01215d3edb0f384ddeaa5e4a22c1ae5ff634149f upstream.

The jh pointer may be used uninitialized in the two cases below and the
compiler complain about it when enabling JBUFFER_TRACE macro, fix them.

In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function âjbd2_journal_get_undo_accessâ:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: âjhâ is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
                                      ^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1219:23: note: âjhâ was declared here
  struct journal_head *jh;
                       ^
In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function âjbd2_journal_dirty_metadataâ:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: âjhâ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
 #define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
                                      ^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1332:23: note: âjhâ was declared here
  struct journal_head *jh;
                       ^

Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/jbd2/transaction.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -1219,11 +1219,12 @@ int jbd2_journal_get_undo_access(handle_
 	struct journal_head *jh;
 	char *committed_data = NULL;
 
-	JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
 	if (jbd2_write_access_granted(handle, bh, true))
 		return 0;
 
 	jh = jbd2_journal_add_journal_head(bh);
+	JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
+
 	/*
 	 * Do this first --- it can drop the journal lock, so we want to
 	 * make sure that obtaining the committed_data is done
@@ -1334,15 +1335,17 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t
 
 	if (is_handle_aborted(handle))
 		return -EROFS;
-	if (!buffer_jbd(bh)) {
-		ret = -EUCLEAN;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (!buffer_jbd(bh))
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+
 	/*
 	 * We don't grab jh reference here since the buffer must be part
 	 * of the running transaction.
 	 */
 	jh = bh2jh(bh);
+	jbd_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
+	JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
+
 	/*
 	 * This and the following assertions are unreliable since we may see jh
 	 * in inconsistent state unless we grab bh_state lock. But this is
@@ -1376,9 +1379,6 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t
 	}
 
 	journal = transaction->t_journal;
-	jbd_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
-	JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
-
 	jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
 
 	if (jh->b_modified == 0) {