[PATCH 4.19 256/280] perf intel-pt: Fix overlap calculation for padding

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Mar 22 2019 - 08:37:52 EST


4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 5a99d99e3310a565b0cf63f785b347be9ee0da45 upstream.

Auxtrace records might have up to 7 bytes of padding appended. Adjust
the overlap accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190206103947.15750-3-adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@

#include "../cache.h"
#include "../util.h"
+#include "../auxtrace.h"

#include "intel-pt-insn-decoder.h"
#include "intel-pt-pkt-decoder.h"
@@ -2558,6 +2559,34 @@ static int intel_pt_tsc_cmp(uint64_t tsc
}
}

+#define MAX_PADDING (PERF_AUXTRACE_RECORD_ALIGNMENT - 1)
+
+/**
+ * adj_for_padding - adjust overlap to account for padding.
+ * @buf_b: second buffer
+ * @buf_a: first buffer
+ * @len_a: size of first buffer
+ *
+ * @buf_a might have up to 7 bytes of padding appended. Adjust the overlap
+ * accordingly.
+ *
+ * Return: A pointer into @buf_b from where non-overlapped data starts
+ */
+static unsigned char *adj_for_padding(unsigned char *buf_b,
+ unsigned char *buf_a, size_t len_a)
+{
+ unsigned char *p = buf_b - MAX_PADDING;
+ unsigned char *q = buf_a + len_a - MAX_PADDING;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = MAX_PADDING; i; i--, p++, q++) {
+ if (*p != *q)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return p;
+}
+
/**
* intel_pt_find_overlap_tsc - determine start of non-overlapped trace data
* using TSC.
@@ -2608,8 +2637,11 @@ static unsigned char *intel_pt_find_over

/* Same TSC, so buffers are consecutive */
if (!cmp && rem_b >= rem_a) {
+ unsigned char *start;
+
*consecutive = true;
- return buf_b + len_b - (rem_b - rem_a);
+ start = buf_b + len_b - (rem_b - rem_a);
+ return adj_for_padding(start, buf_a, len_a);
}
if (cmp < 0)
return buf_b; /* tsc_a < tsc_b => no overlap */
@@ -2672,7 +2704,7 @@ unsigned char *intel_pt_find_overlap(uns
found = memmem(buf_a, len_a, buf_b, len_a);
if (found) {
*consecutive = true;
- return buf_b + len_a;
+ return adj_for_padding(buf_b + len_a, buf_a, len_a);
}

/* Try again at next PSB in buffer 'a' */