[BACKPORT 4.14.y 1/8] scsi: ufs: fix wrong command type of UTRD for UFSHCI v2.1

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Fri Mar 22 2019 - 12:18:22 EST


From: kehuanlin <chgokhl@xxxxxxxxx>

Since the command type of UTRD in UFS 2.1 specification is the same with
UFS 2.0. And it assumes the future UFS specification will follow the
same definition.

Signed-off-by: kehuanlin <kehuanlin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
(cherry picked from commit 83dc7e3dea76b77b6bcc289eb86c5b5c145e8dff)
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 66540491839e..581571de2461 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -2195,10 +2195,11 @@ static int ufshcd_comp_devman_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
u32 upiu_flags;
int ret = 0;

- if (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_20)
- lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
- else
+ if ((hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_10) ||
+ (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_11))
lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_DEV_MANAGE;
+ else
+ lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;

ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags, DMA_NONE);
if (hba->dev_cmd.type == DEV_CMD_TYPE_QUERY)
@@ -2222,10 +2223,11 @@ static int ufshcd_comp_scsi_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
u32 upiu_flags;
int ret = 0;

- if (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_20)
- lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;
- else
+ if ((hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_10) ||
+ (hba->ufs_version == UFSHCI_VERSION_11))
lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_SCSI;
+ else
+ lrbp->command_type = UTP_CMD_TYPE_UFS_STORAGE;

if (likely(lrbp->cmd)) {
ufshcd_prepare_req_desc_hdr(lrbp, &upiu_flags,
--
2.20.0