Re: [PATCH] rdb: convert all rbd_assert(0) to BUG()

From: Ilya Dryomov
Date: Mon Mar 25 2019 - 07:10:54 EST


On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 5:54 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> rbd_assert(0) has caused different issues depending on
> the compiler version in the past, so it seems better to avoid it
> completely.
>
> Replace the remaining instances.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index cbcc3baf3807..564c5069cc78 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ static void rbd_obj_zero_range(struct rbd_obj_request *obj_req, u32 off,
> zero_bvecs(&obj_req->bvec_pos, off, bytes);
> break;
> default:
> - rbd_assert(0);
> + BUG();
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static void rbd_obj_request_destroy(struct kref *kref)
> kfree(obj_request->bvec_pos.bvecs);
> break;
> default:
> - rbd_assert(0);
> + BUG();
> }
>
> kfree(obj_request->img_extents);
> @@ -1797,7 +1797,7 @@ static void rbd_osd_req_setup_data(struct rbd_obj_request *obj_req, u32 which)
> &obj_req->bvec_pos);
> break;
> default:
> - rbd_assert(0);
> + BUG();
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2052,7 +2052,7 @@ static int __rbd_img_fill_request(struct rbd_img_request *img_req)
> ret = rbd_obj_setup_zeroout(obj_req);
> break;
> default:
> - rbd_assert(0);
> + BUG();
> }
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> @@ -2531,7 +2531,7 @@ static int rbd_obj_issue_copyup_ops(struct rbd_obj_request *obj_req, u32 bytes)
> num_osd_ops += count_zeroout_ops(obj_req);
> break;
> default:
> - rbd_assert(0);
> + BUG();
> }
>
> obj_req->osd_req = rbd_osd_req_create(obj_req, num_osd_ops);
> @@ -2558,7 +2558,7 @@ static int rbd_obj_issue_copyup_ops(struct rbd_obj_request *obj_req, u32 bytes)
> __rbd_obj_setup_zeroout(obj_req, which);
> break;
> default:
> - rbd_assert(0);
> + BUG();
> }
>
> ret = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(obj_req->osd_req, GFP_NOIO);

Applied.

Thanks,

Ilya