Re:Re: [PATCH] block/mq: blk map queues by core id

From: luferry
Date: Mon Mar 25 2019 - 11:25:27 EST

Next message: Christophe Leroy: "Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()"
Previous message: Frederic Barrat: "Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] ocxl: afu_irq only deals with IRQ IDs, not offsets"
In reply to: Dongli Zhang: "Re: [PATCH] block/mq: blk map queues by core id"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Thanks for your kindly suggestions, I will reformat this patch later!

At 2019-03-25 21:53:00, "Dongli Zhang" <dongli.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>On 03/25/2019 05:53 PM, luferry wrote:
>>
>> sorry, messed up some func name
>>
>> When enable virtio-blk with multi queues but with only 2 msix-vector.
>> vp_dev->per_vq_vectors will be false, so blk_mq_virtio_map_queues will fallback to blk_mq_map_queues
>>
>> Since virtual machine users cannot change the vector numbers, I think blk_mq_map_queues should be more friendly with different cpu topology.
>
>
>Yes, we will fallback to blk_mq_map_queues if there is lack of vectors.
>
>Here is the qemu cmdline:
>"-smp 8,sockets=1,cores=4,threads=2"
>"-device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive0,id=device0,num-queues=4,vectors=2"
>
># cat /sys/block/vda/mq/0/cpu_list
>0, 4, 5
>root@vm:/home/zhang# cat /sys/block/vda/mq/1/cpu_list
>1
>root@vm:/home/zhang# cat /sys/block/vda/mq/2/cpu_list
>2, 6, 7
>root@vm:/home/zhang# cat /sys/block/vda/mq/3/cpu_list
>3
>
>How about to put how to hit the issue in commit message so people would be able
>to know the scenario?
>
>Dongli Zhang
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At 2019-03-25 17:49:33, "luferry" <luferry@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> After reading the code and compare pci device info.
>>> I can reproduce this imbalance under KVM.
>>> When enable virtio-blk with multi queues but with only 2 msix-vector.
>>> vp_dev->per_vq_vectors will be false, so blk_mq_virtio_map_queues will fallback to virtio_mq_map_queues
>>>
>>> Since virtual machine users cannot change the vector numbers, I think virtio_mq_map_queues should be more friendly with different cpu topology.
>>>
>>> 448 const struct cpumask *vp_get_vq_affinity(struct virtio_device *vdev, int index)
>>> 449 {
>>> 450 struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = to_vp_device(vdev);
>>> 451
>>> 452 if (!vp_dev->per_vq_vectors ||
>>> 453 vp_dev->vqs[index]->msix_vector == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR)
>>> 454 return NULL;
>>> 455
>>> 456 return pci_irq_get_affinity(vp_dev->pci_dev,
>>> 457 vp_dev->vqs[index]->msix_vector);
>>> 458 }
>>>
>>> 32 int blk_mq_virtio_map_queues(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap,
>>> 33 struct virtio_device *vdev, int first_vec)
>>> 34 {
>>> 35 const struct cpumask *mask;
>>> 36 unsigned int queue, cpu;
>>> 37
>>> 38 if (!vdev->config->get_vq_affinity)
>>> 39 goto fallback;
>>> 40
>>> 41 for (queue = 0; queue < qmap->nr_queues; queue++) {
>>> 42 mask = vdev->config->get_vq_affinity(vdev, first_vec + queue); //vp_get_vq_affinity
>>> 43 if (!mask)
>>> 44 goto fallback;
>>> 45
>>> 46 for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
>>> 47 qmap->mq_map[cpu] = qmap->queue_offset + queue;
>>> 48 }
>>> 49
>>> 50 return 0;
>>> 51 fallback:
>>> 52 return blk_mq_map_queues(qmap);
>>> 53 }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> At 2019-03-23 19:14:34, "Dongli Zhang" <dongli.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/23/2019 02:34 PM, luferry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I just bought one vm , so i cannot access to hypervisor. I will try to build the environment on my desktop.
>>>>> I'm sure about something.
>>>>> The hypervisor is KVM and disk driver is virtio-blk.
>>>>> [root@blk-mq ~]# dmesg |grep KVM
>>>>> [ 0.000000] Hypervisor detected: KVM
>>>>> [ 0.186330] Booting paravirtualized kernel on KVM
>>>>> [ 0.279106] KVM setup async PF for cpu 0
>>>>> [ 0.420819] KVM setup async PF for cpu 1
>>>>> [ 0.421682] KVM setup async PF for cpu 2
>>>>> [ 0.422113] KVM setup async PF for cpu 3
>>>>> [ 0.422434] KVM setup async PF for cpu 4
>>>>> [ 0.422434] KVM setup async PF for cpu 5
>>>>> [ 0.423312] KVM setup async PF for cpu 6
>>>>> [ 0.423394] KVM setup async PF for cpu 7
>>>>> [ 0.424125] KVM setup async PF for cpu 8
>>>>> [ 0.424414] KVM setup async PF for cpu 9
>>>>> [ 0.424415] KVM setup async PF for cpu 10
>>>>> [ 0.425329] KVM setup async PF for cpu 11
>>>>> [ 0.425420] KVM setup async PF for cpu 12
>>>>> [ 0.426156] KVM setup async PF for cpu 13
>>>>> [ 0.426431] KVM setup async PF for cpu 14
>>>>> [ 0.426431] KVM setup async PF for cpu 15
>>>>> [root@blk-mq ~]# lspci |grep block
>>>>> 00:05.0 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio block device
>>>>> 00:06.0 SCSI storage controller: Red Hat, Inc. Virtio block device
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@blk-mq ~]# lscpu
>>>>> Architecture: x86_64
>>>>> CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
>>>>> Byte Order: Little Endian
>>>>> CPU(s): 16
>>>>> On-line CPU(s) list: 0-15
>>>>> Thread(s) per core: 2
>>>>> Core(s) per socket: 8
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@blk-mq ~]# ls /sys/block/vdb/mq/
>>>>> 0 1 2 3
>>>>>
>>>>> [root@blk-mq ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo |egrep 'processor|core id'
>>>>> processor : 0
>>>>> core id : 0
>>>>> processor : 1
>>>>> core id : 0
>>>>> processor : 2
>>>>> core id : 1
>>>>> processor : 3
>>>>> core id : 1
>>>>> processor : 4
>>>>> core id : 2
>>>>> processor : 5
>>>>> core id : 2
>>>>> processor : 6
>>>>> core id : 3
>>>>> processor : 7
>>>>> core id : 3
>>>>> processor : 8
>>>>> core id : 4
>>>>> processor : 9
>>>>> core id : 4
>>>>> processor : 10
>>>>> core id : 5
>>>>> processor : 11
>>>>> core id : 5
>>>>> processor : 12
>>>>> core id : 6
>>>>> processor : 13
>>>>> core id : 6
>>>>> processor : 14
>>>>> core id : 7
>>>>> processor : 15
>>>>> core id : 7
>>>>>
>>>>> --before this patch--
>>>>> [root@blk-mq ~]# cat /sys/block/vdb/mq/*/cpu_list
>>>>> 0, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 13
>>>>> 1
>>>>> 2, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15
>>>>> 3
>>>>>
>>>>> --after this patch--
>>>>> [root@blk-mq ~]# cat /sys/block/vdb/mq/*/cpu_list
>>>>> 0, 4, 5, 12, 13
>>>>> 1, 6, 7, 14, 15
>>>>> 2, 8, 9
>>>>> 3, 10, 11
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I add dump_stack insert blk_mq_map_queues.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 1.378680] Call Trace:
>>>>> [ 1.378690] dump_stack+0x5a/0x73
>>>>> [ 1.378695] blk_mq_map_queues+0x29/0xb0
>>>>> [ 1.378700] blk_mq_alloc_tag_set+0x1bd/0x2d0
>>>>> [ 1.378705] virtblk_probe+0x1ae/0x8e4 [virtio_blk]
>>>>> [ 1.378709] virtio_dev_probe+0x18a/0x230 [virtio]
>>>>> [ 1.378713] really_probe+0x215/0x3f0
>>>>> [ 1.378716] driver_probe_device+0x115/0x130
>>>>> [ 1.378718] device_driver_attach+0x50/0x60
>>>>> [ 1.378720] __driver_attach+0xbd/0x140
>>>>> [ 1.378722] ? device_driver_attach+0x60/0x60
>>>>> [ 1.378724] bus_for_each_dev+0x67/0xc0
>>>>> [ 1.378727] ? klist_add_tail+0x57/0x70
>>>>
>>>> I am not able to reproduce above call stack when virtio-blk is assigned 4 queues
>>>> while my qemu cmdline is "-smp 16,sockets=1,cores=8,threads=2".
>>>>
>>>> # cat /sys/block/vda/mq/0/cpu_list
>>>> 0, 1, 2, 3
>>>> # cat /sys/block/vda/mq/1/cpu_list
>>>> 4, 5, 6, 7
>>>> # cat /sys/block/vda/mq/2/cpu_list
>>>> 8, 9, 10, 11
>>>> # cat /sys/block/vda/mq/3/cpu_list
>>>> 12, 13, 14, 15
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do agree in above case we would have issue if the mapping is established by
>>>> blk_mq_map_queues().
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> However, I am just curious how we finally reach at blk_mq_map_queues() from
>>>> blk_mq_alloc_tag_set()?
>>>>
>>>> It should be something like:
>>>>
>>>> blk_mq_alloc_tag_set()
>>>> -> blk_mq_update_queue_map()
>>>> -> if (set->ops->map_queues && !is_kdump_kernel())
>>>> return set->ops->map_queues(set);
>>>> -> else
>>>> return blk_mq_map_queues(&set->map[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT]);
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't we always have set->ops->map_queues = virtblk_map_queues()?
>>>>
>>>> Or the execution reach at:
>>>>
>>>> virtblk_map_queues()
>>>> -> blk_mq_virtio_map_queues()
>>>> -> if (!vdev->config->get_vq_affinity)
>>>> return blk_mq_map_queues(qmap);
>>>> -> else
>>>> establish the mapping via get_vq_affinity
>>>>
>>>> but vdev->config->get_vq_affinity == NULL?
>>>>
>>>> For virtio pci, get_vq_affinity is always set. Seems virtio mmio would not set
>>>> get_vq_affinity.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I used to play with firecracker (by amazon) and it is interesting firecracker
>>>> uses mmio to setup virtio-blk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for disturbing the review of this patch. I just would like to clarify in
>>>> which scenario we would hit this issue, e.g., when virtio-blk is based on mmio?
>>>>
>>>> Dongli Zhang
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> At 2019-03-22 19:58:08, "Dongli Zhang" <dongli.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 03/22/2019 06:09 PM, luferry wrote:
>>>>>>> under virtual machine environment, cpu topology may differ from normal
>>>>>>> physical server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would mind share the name of virtual machine monitor, the command line if
>>>>>> available, and which device to reproduce.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For instance, I am not able to reproduce with qemu nvme or virtio-blk as I
>>>>>> assume they use pci or virtio specific mapper to establish the mapping.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> E.g., with qemu and nvme: -smp 8,sockets=1,cores=4,threads=2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed I use three queues instead of twp as one is reserved for admin.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # ls /sys/block/nvme0n1/mq/*
>>>>>> /sys/block/nvme0n1/mq/0:
>>>>>> cpu0 cpu1 cpu2 cpu3 cpu_list nr_reserved_tags nr_tags
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /sys/block/nvme0n1/mq/1:
>>>>>> cpu4 cpu5 cpu6 cpu7 cpu_list nr_reserved_tags nr_tags
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you very much!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dongli Zhang
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for example (machine with 4 cores, 2 threads per core):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> normal physical server:
>>>>>>> core-id thread-0-id thread-1-id
>>>>>>> 0 0 4
>>>>>>> 1 1 5
>>>>>>> 2 2 6
>>>>>>> 3 3 7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> virtual machine:
>>>>>>> core-id thread-0-id thread-1-id
>>>>>>> 0 0 1
>>>>>>> 1 2 3
>>>>>>> 2 4 5
>>>>>>> 3 6 7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When attach disk with two queues, all the even numbered cpus will be
>>>>>>> mapped to queue 0. Under virtual machine, all the cpus is followed by
>>>>>>> its sibling cpu.Before this patch, all the odd numbered cpus will also
>>>>>>> be mapped to queue 0, can cause serious imbalance.this will lead to
>>>>>>> performance impact on system IO
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So suggest to allocate cpu map by core id, this can be more currency
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: luferry <luferry@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> block/blk-mq-cpumap.c | 9 +++++----
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
>>>>>>> index 03a534820271..4125e8e77679 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
>>>>>>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ int blk_mq_map_queues(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> unsigned int *map = qmap->mq_map;
>>>>>>> unsigned int nr_queues = qmap->nr_queues;
>>>>>>> - unsigned int cpu, first_sibling;
>>>>>>> + unsigned int cpu, first_sibling, core = 0;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>> @@ -48,9 +48,10 @@ int blk_mq_map_queues(struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap)
>>>>>>> map[cpu] = cpu_to_queue_index(qmap, nr_queues, cpu);
>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>> first_sibling = get_first_sibling(cpu);
>>>>>>> - if (first_sibling == cpu)
>>>>>>> - map[cpu] = cpu_to_queue_index(qmap, nr_queues, cpu);
>>>>>>> - else
>>>>>>> + if (first_sibling == cpu) {
>>>>>>> + map[cpu] = cpu_to_queue_index(qmap, nr_queues, core);
>>>>>>> + core++;
>>>>>>> + } else
>>>>>>> map[cpu] = map[first_sibling];
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>

Next message: Christophe Leroy: "Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] locking/rwsem: Optimize down_read_trylock()"
Previous message: Frederic Barrat: "Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] ocxl: afu_irq only deals with IRQ IDs, not offsets"
In reply to: Dongli Zhang: "Re: [PATCH] block/mq: blk map queues by core id"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]