Re: [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device()
From: Masahiro Yamada
Date: Tue Mar 26 2019 - 02:55:25 EST
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:19 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Applied to linux-kbuild.
>
> A questionable development version was integrated for this SmPL script.
Sorry for my bad job.
I usually use LKML patchwork to find patches.
When I searched "Wen Yang", v6 did not show up for some reasons.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=&submitter=22638&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=
So, I just thought v5 was the latest one
and I was completely missing the context.
Apology.
Masahiro
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci?id=da9cfb87a44da61f2403c4312916befcb6b6d7e8
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/201902191014156680299@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
>
> Now I am curious on how such a source code analysis approach will be
> improved further.
> Which changes will get the desired acceptance?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1053979/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1553321671-27749-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@xxxxxxxxxx/
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-March/005679.html
>
> Regards,
> Markus
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada