Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: dts: exynos: Add proper regulator states for suspend-to-mem for odroid-u3
From: Anand Moon
Date: Tue Mar 26 2019 - 06:35:44 EST
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks your for your valuable comments.
I will try to answer your queries to best of my knowledge.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 18:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2019 at 09:33, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Add suspend-to-mem node to regulator core to be enabled or disabled
> > during system suspend and also support changing the regulator operating
> > mode during runtime and when the system enter sleep mode (stand by mode).
> >
> > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Current patch:
> >
> > Note: Both microSD and eMMC suspend resume works this changes at my end.
> >
> > regulator-off-in-suspend:
> > set the regulator node into suspend state i.e. standby mode during suspend
> > operation.
> >
> > Current changes are based on
> > [0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/max77686.txt
> >
> > Regulators which can be turned off during system suspend:
> > -LDOn : 2, 6-8, 10-12, 14-16,
> > -BUCKn : 1-4.
> > Use standard regulator bindings for it ('regulator-off-in-suspend').
> >
> > drop the suspend off binding which are not supported by the driver.
> >
> > RFC version
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10810909/
> > These changes had some problem with eMMC not entering into suspend mode.
> > with some miss configuration in regulator-off-in-suspend mode.
> >
> > Changes from previos patch.
> > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10712549/
> >
> > Set all the non used regulator in suspend-odd state
> > LD02, LD03, LD05, LD06, LD07, LD011, LD013, LDO14, LD016
> >
> > BUCK5, BUCK6, BUCK7 and not confirable as per driver max77686-regulator
> > ---
> > .../boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi
> > index 08d3a0a7b4eb..375156ad5454 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi
> > @@ -288,6 +288,9 @@
> > regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > regulator-always-on;
> > + regulator-state-mem {
> > + regulator-off-in-suspend;
>
> Please maintain proper versioning of patches.
> First patch sent to lists should be either RFC or v1. Second
> release/submission is then always v2. Third v3.
I tried to mixed up some changes that's the reason.
Ok if needed next version will be Patch V3.
>
> This is third or fourth submission but you marked it as v1. This makes
> it very difficult to discuss and reference previous versions.
>
> The commit message did not change since beginning (first version). I
> asked twice that you need to explain exactly why you put the the
> regulator to off or on state in suspend. Why?
> Because:
> 1. This change looks without justification - once you put on, then you
> put off, now again on,
> 2. Anyone reading the code later must know the rationale why this was done,
> 3. I am not quite sure whether this is good setting so I would be
> happy to be convinced.
>
Like I mention in the patch summary that this.
Current changes are based on
[0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/max77686.txt
Regulators which can be turned off during system suspend:
-LDOn : 2, 6-8, 10-12, 14-16,
-BUCKn : 1-4.
Use standard regulator bindings for it ('regulator-off-in-suspend').
> How to provide such explanation? The best in commit message. Sometimes
> in the comment in the code, depends.
Ok I have been testing with following regulator debug prints to catch error.
[0] max77686-regulator.patch
below is the console logs during suspend and resume.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last login: Sat Mar 23 18:22:46 on ttySAC1
[root@archl-u3e ~]# echo no > /sys/module/printk/parameters/console_suspend
[root@archl-u3e ~]# rtcwake -d /dev/rtc0 -m mem -s 10
rtcwake: wakeup from "mem" using /dev/rtc0 at Sat Mar 23 19:56:17 2019
[ 38.595854] PM: suspend entry (deep)
[ 38.596603] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 38.629351] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.002 seconds) done.
[ 38.633192] OOM killer disabled.
[ 38.636035] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001
seconds) done.
[ 38.675059] smsc95xx 1-2:1.0 eth0: entering SUSPEND2 mode
[ 38.753120] dwc2 12480000.hsotg: suspending usb gadget g_ether
[ 38.754007] dwc2 12480000.hsotg: new device is full-speed
[ 38.758960] dwc2 12480000.hsotg: dwc2_hsotg_ep_disable: called for ep0
[ 38.765507] dwc2 12480000.hsotg: dwc2_hsotg_ep_disable: called for ep0
[ 38.774050] wake enabled for irq 119
[ 38.775761] BUCK9: No configuration
[ 38.779191] BUCK8_P3V3: No configuration
[ 38.782852] BUCK7_2.0V: No configuration
[ 38.786851] BUCK6_1.35V: No configuration
[ 38.790752] VDDQ_CKEM1_2_1.2V: No configuration
[ 38.796220] BUCK4: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.800769] BUCK3: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.806002] BUCK1: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.810644] LDO26: No configuration
[ 38.814169] VDDQ_LCD_1.8V: No configuration
[ 38.818267] LDO24: No configuration
[ 38.821732] LDO23: No configuration
[ 38.825262] LDO22_VDDQ_MMC4_2.8V: No configuration
[ 38.829992] TFLASH_2.8V: No configuration
[ 38.834040] LDO20_1.8V: No configuration
[ 38.837883] LDO19: No configuration
[ 38.841349] LDO18: No configuration
[ 38.844878] LDO17: No configuration
[ 38.848667] LDO16: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.853889] LDO15: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.858931] LDO14: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.863771] VDDQ_C2C_W_1.8V: No configuration
[ 38.868378] LDO12: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.873508] LDO11: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.878545] LDO10: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.883384] LDO9: No configuration
[ 38.887190] LDO8: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.892168] LDO7: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.897279] LDO6: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.901872] VDDQ_MMC1_3_1.8V: No configuration
[ 38.906363] VDDQ_MMC2_2.8V: No configuration
[ 38.910541] VDDQ_EXT_1.8V: No configuration
[ 38.915134] LDO2: regulator suspend disable supported
[ 38.919753] VDD_ALIVE_1.0V: No configuration
[ 38.935229] usb3503 0-0008: switched to STANDBY mode
[ 38.935981] wake enabled for irq 123
[ 38.955192] samsung-pinctrl 11000000.pinctrl: Setting external
wakeup interrupt mask: 0xfbfff7ff
[ 38.975448] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
[ 39.029279] s3c2410-wdt 10060000.watchdog: watchdog disabled
[ 39.029576] wake disabled for irq 123
[ 39.044319] usb3503 0-0008: switched to HUB mode
[ 39.144089] wake disabled for irq 119
[ 39.144812] dwc2 12480000.hsotg: resuming usb gadget g_ether
[ 39.422626] usb 1-2: reset high-speed USB device number 2 using exynos-ehci
[ 39.774632] usb 1-3: reset high-speed USB device number 3 using exynos-ehci
[ 40.106478] OOM killer enabled.
[ 40.106609] Restarting tasks ... done.
[ 40.111100] PM: suspend exit
[ 40.124058] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) = 50000000Hz (slot
req 400000Hz, actual 396825HZ div = 63)
[root@archl-u3e ~]# [ 40.364705] mmc_host mmc1: Bus speed (slot 0) =
50000000Hz (slot req 52000000Hz, actual 50000000HZ div = 0)
[ 41.220200] smsc95xx 1-2:1.0 eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0xC5E1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> How such explanation could look like? For example like this:
> f8f3b7fc21b1 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix regulators configuration on Peach
> Pi/Pit Chromebooks")
> Marek clearly explained why he put the regulators "always-on", even
> tough we do not know everything about this. More over, he mentions
> that this fixes specific issue.
>
Thanks but I am not the expert here in general with regulator on/off.
I will add comment if needed explain in more detail.
[snip]
> Summarizing, please answer:
> 1. Why this is made off-in-suspend?
> 2. Why this can be made off-in-suspend?
>
On MAX77686A PMIC. (some quote from the datasheet).
Power ON/OFF by PWRREQ in PMIC=ON sequence is only effective when ON/OFF
on all regulators above are assigned by PWRREQ=H/L.
All programming must be done before the AP enters the sleep mode by
pulling PWRREQ low since
the AP does not have programming capability in (deep) sleep mode.
*Regulator are not really turned off but set into IDLE / Standby
state too be restored to Normal state*
Power summary in image : [1] https://imgur.com/gallery/l74kliX
Power Summary for MAX77686A of the regulator support PWRREQ
Power Default ON | ON/OFF
--------------------------------------
BUCK1 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
BUCK2 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
BUCK3 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
BUCK4 | ON | PWREWQ or I2C
BUCK5 | ON | I2C
BUCK6 | ON | I2C
BUCK7 | ON | I2C
BUCK8 | OFF | I2C or ENB8 The external enable/disable pin, ENB8
BUCK9 | OFF | I2C or ENB9 The external enable/disable pin, ENB9
LDO1 | ON | I2C
LDO2 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO3 | ON | I2C
LDO4 | ON | I2C
LDO5 | ON | I2C
LDO6 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO7 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO8 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO9 | OFF | I2C
LDO10 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO11 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO12 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO13 | ON | I2C
LDO14 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO15 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO16 | ON | PWRREQ or I2C
LDO17 | OFF | I2C
LDO18 | OFF | I2C
LDO19 | OFF | I2C
LDO20 | OFF | I2C OR ENL20 ENL20, external enable/disable pin
LDO21 | OFF | I2C OR ENL21 ENL21, external enable/disable pin
LDO22 | OFF | I2C OR ENL22 ENL22, external enable/disable pin
LDO23 | OFF | I2C
LDO24 | OFF | I2C
LDO25 | OFF | I2C
LDO26 | OFF | I2C
> > ldo20_reg: LDO20 {
> > @@ -421,6 +451,9 @@
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
> > regulator-always-on;
> > regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-state-mem {
> > + regulator-off-in-suspend;
> > + };
> > };
>
> I questioned this change two times. You did not answer to my
> question... If you turn memory bus regulator off, how the memory will
> work in Suspend-to-Memory mode? I might be missing here something but
> it just looks suspicious. Maybe the regulator does not supply the
> memory itself (so refresh works even when it is down), just the
> interface? I don't know, it just looks suspicious. I need to see
> proper explanation.
>
> I am sorry but I will not check other hunks in this patch. Please
> provide the answers for all my questions here first.
>
As per above table of MAX77686 PWRREQ capabilities regulator nodes
can be turned off during suspend reset of them remain on during suspend.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
We could monitor the regulator states via sys filesystem and also
using below tool
https://git.linaro.org/power/powerdebug.git
I have tried to summaries the feature required for this patch.
some of which I have overlooked earlier before sending the patch.
I am really poor in english for transform / interpreter the technical details
required at for your queries. But I will try to improve my self in the future.
Best Regards
-Anand
Attachment:
max77686-regulator.patch
Description: Binary data