Re: [PATCH ghak90 V5 05/10] audit: add containerid support for ptrace and signals

From: Richard Guy Briggs
Date: Wed Mar 27 2019 - 22:04:33 EST

Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: build failure after merge of the pidfd tree"
Previous message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: [PATCH net-next v5 04/22] ethtool: move to its own directory"
In reply to: Ondrej Mosnacek: "Re: [PATCH ghak90 V5 05/10] audit: add containerid support for ptrace and signals"
Next in thread: Richard Guy Briggs: "Re: [PATCH ghak90 V5 05/10] audit: add containerid support for ptrace and signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2019-03-27 22:17, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 7:34 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Add audit container identifier support to ptrace and signals. In
> > particular, the "ref" field provides a way to label the auxiliary record
> > to which it is associated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/audit.h | 1 +
> > kernel/audit.c | 2 ++
> > kernel/audit.h | 2 ++
> > kernel/auditsc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> > 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
> > index 43438192ca2a..ebd6625ca80e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/audit.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct audit_sig_info {
> > uid_t uid;
> > pid_t pid;
> > char ctx[0];
> > + u64 cid;
> > };
>
> It seems like this structure implicitly defines the format of some
> message that is sent to userspace... If so, how will userspace detect
> that a new format (including the cid) is being used? Even assuming the
> fixed order as pointed out by Neil, the message still seems to be
> variable-sized so userspace cannot even use the length to infer that.
> Am I missing something here? (I hope I am :)

How humble of you again. No, you're not missing something. This ends
up being an api change... That can be fixed in userspace by checking
for AUDIT_FEATURE_BITMAP_CONTAINERID, but how do we make a newer kernel
not break an older userspace... I think this was the original rationale
for adding it after the ctx but totally missing the fact that the latter
is a variable-length field.

This patch really should be split into audit_sig_cid changes in a patch
by itself and target_cid changes which could go with the second and
fourth patches.

> > struct audit_buffer;
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> > index 8cc0e88d7f2a..cfa659b3f6c4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct audit_net {
> > kuid_t audit_sig_uid = INVALID_UID;
> > pid_t audit_sig_pid = -1;
> > u32 audit_sig_sid = 0;
> > +u64 audit_sig_cid = AUDIT_CID_UNSET;
> >
> > /* Records can be lost in several ways:
> > 0) [suppressed in audit_alloc]
> > @@ -1515,6 +1516,7 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
> > memcpy(sig_data->ctx, ctx, len);
> > security_release_secctx(ctx, len);
> > }
> > + sig_data->cid = audit_sig_cid;
> > audit_send_reply(skb, seq, AUDIT_SIGNAL_INFO, 0, 0,
> > sig_data, sizeof(*sig_data) + len);
> > kfree(sig_data);
> > diff --git a/kernel/audit.h b/kernel/audit.h
> > index c00e2ee3c6b3..c5ac6436317e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/audit.h
> > +++ b/kernel/audit.h
> > @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ struct audit_context {
> > kuid_t target_uid;
> > unsigned int target_sessionid;
> > u32 target_sid;
> > + u64 target_cid;
> > char target_comm[TASK_COMM_LEN];
> >
> > struct audit_tree_refs *trees, *first_trees;
> > @@ -344,6 +345,7 @@ extern void audit_filter_inodes(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > extern pid_t audit_sig_pid;
> > extern kuid_t audit_sig_uid;
> > extern u32 audit_sig_sid;
> > +extern u64 audit_sig_cid;
> >
> > extern int audit_filter(int msgtype, unsigned int listtype);
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/auditsc.c b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > index a8c8b44b954d..f04e115df5dc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/auditsc.c
> > +++ b/kernel/auditsc.c
> > @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct audit_aux_data_pids {
> > kuid_t target_uid[AUDIT_AUX_PIDS];
> > unsigned int target_sessionid[AUDIT_AUX_PIDS];
> > u32 target_sid[AUDIT_AUX_PIDS];
> > + u64 target_cid[AUDIT_AUX_PIDS];
> > char target_comm[AUDIT_AUX_PIDS][TASK_COMM_LEN];
> > int pid_count;
> > };
> > @@ -1514,7 +1515,7 @@ static void audit_log_exit(void)
> > for (aux = context->aux_pids; aux; aux = aux->next) {
> > struct audit_aux_data_pids *axs = (void *)aux;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < axs->pid_count; i++)
> > + for (i = 0; i < axs->pid_count; i++) {
> > if (audit_log_pid_context(context, axs->target_pid[i],
> > axs->target_auid[i],
> > axs->target_uid[i],
> > @@ -1522,14 +1523,20 @@ static void audit_log_exit(void)
> > axs->target_sid[i],
> > axs->target_comm[i]))
> > call_panic = 1;
> > + audit_log_contid(context, axs->target_cid[i]);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > - if (context->target_pid &&
> > - audit_log_pid_context(context, context->target_pid,
> > - context->target_auid, context->target_uid,
> > - context->target_sessionid,
> > - context->target_sid, context->target_comm))
> > + if (context->target_pid) {
> > + if (audit_log_pid_context(context, context->target_pid,
> > + context->target_auid,
> > + context->target_uid,
> > + context->target_sessionid,
> > + context->target_sid,
> > + context->target_comm))
> > call_panic = 1;
> > + audit_log_contid(context, context->target_cid);
> > + }
> >
> > if (context->pwd.dentry && context->pwd.mnt) {
> > ab = audit_log_start(context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CWD);
> > @@ -2360,6 +2367,7 @@ void __audit_ptrace(struct task_struct *t)
> > context->target_uid = task_uid(t);
> > context->target_sessionid = audit_get_sessionid(t);
> > security_task_getsecid(t, &context->target_sid);
> > + context->target_cid = audit_get_contid(t);
> > memcpy(context->target_comm, t->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2387,6 +2395,7 @@ int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
> > else
> > audit_sig_uid = uid;
> > security_task_getsecid(current, &audit_sig_sid);
> > + audit_sig_cid = audit_get_contid(current);
> > }
> >
> > if (!audit_signals || audit_dummy_context())
> > @@ -2400,6 +2409,7 @@ int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
> > ctx->target_uid = t_uid;
> > ctx->target_sessionid = audit_get_sessionid(t);
> > security_task_getsecid(t, &ctx->target_sid);
> > + ctx->target_cid = audit_get_contid(t);
> > memcpy(ctx->target_comm, t->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -2421,6 +2431,7 @@ int audit_signal_info(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
> > axp->target_uid[axp->pid_count] = t_uid;
> > axp->target_sessionid[axp->pid_count] = audit_get_sessionid(t);
> > security_task_getsecid(t, &axp->target_sid[axp->pid_count]);
> > + axp->target_cid[axp->pid_count] = audit_get_contid(t);
> > memcpy(axp->target_comm[axp->pid_count], t->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> > axp->pid_count++;
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace at redhat dot com>
> Software Engineer, Security Technologies
> Red Hat, Inc.

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: build failure after merge of the pidfd tree"
Previous message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: [PATCH net-next v5 04/22] ethtool: move to its own directory"
In reply to: Ondrej Mosnacek: "Re: [PATCH ghak90 V5 05/10] audit: add containerid support for ptrace and signals"
Next in thread: Richard Guy Briggs: "Re: [PATCH ghak90 V5 05/10] audit: add containerid support for ptrace and signals"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]