Re: [PATCH net-next v5 05/22] ethtool: introduce ethtool netlink interface

[Florian Fainelli]

On 3/27/2019 2:50 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> 
> Why don't you have ETHTOOL_MSG_SET_FOO for set? I think that for
> kerne->userspace the ETHTOOL_MSG_FOO if fine. I would change the
> ordering of words thought, but it is cosmetics:
> ETHTOOL_MSG_FOO /* kernel->userspace messages - replies, notifications */
> ETHTOOL_MSG_FOO_GET
> ETHTOOL_MSG_FOO_SET
> ETHTOOL_MSG_FOO_ACT
> 
> What do you think?

We could even name the notification explicitly with: ETHTOOL_MSG_NOTIF
or ETHTOOL_MSG_NTF just so we spell out exactly what those messages are.
-- 
Florian