Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] Secure Launch boot protocol

[Daniel Kiper]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:15:53AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> So, per our conversation today, lets create a new, readonly, data structure
> pointed to by a single field in setup_header, in order to preserve what little
> space we have left in that structure (a whopping 24 bytes...)
>
> The new data structure will have a header consisting of a magic number and a
> length field; if we want to be really paranoid we could add a checksum/crc.
>
> The existence of this new readonly structure will be announced by bumping the
> boot protocol to 2.15.
>
> The presence of your new boot launch capability (trenchboot) will be indicated
> by a new bit in xloadflags.
>
> I thought hard about this, and I have come to the conclusion that the new
> structure is better off in the .rodata section of the compressed kernel rather
> than in the setup area, for the following reasons, some of which are
> theoretical and unlikely to apply anywhere in the near future, but don't
> actually hurt to address right off the bat:
>
> a. The future size of the structure would not be artificially constrained by
>    the 32K hard limit on the setup area;
> b. It is one less level of indirection in the build tools;
> c. It adds a possibly unnecessary dependency on the setup area, which could
>    possibly be awkward for some boot loaders (unlikely, but...);
> d. It would allow this new structure to also carry information that might be
>    useful to the decompressor for whatever reason.

Thank you for your help. I will try to post the patches next week.

Daniel