Re: [PATCH] clk:Fix divide by 0 error in divider_ro_round_rate_parent

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting nixiaoming (2019-03-29 02:05:24)
> In the function divider_recalc_rate The judgment of the return value of

Please write divider_recalc_rate() with parenthesis to show it's a
function.

> _get_div indicates that the return value of _get_div may be 0.

__get_div()

> In order to avoid the divide-by-zero error, add check the return value
> of _get_div in the divider_ro_round_rate_parent
> 
> Signed-off-by: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@xxxxxxxxxx>

Is this your name? nixiaoming? Or is it written some other way?

> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index e5a1726..0854e3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,8 @@ long divider_ro_round_rate_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *parent,
>         int div;
>  
>         div = _get_div(table, val, flags, width);
> +       if (!div) /* avoid divide-by-zero */
> +               return -EINVAL;

How does _get_div() return 0? What is the value of 'flags' here when
this goes wrong?

>  
>         /* Even a read-only clock can propagate a rate change */
>         if (clk_hw_get_flags(hw) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> -- 
> 1.8.5.6
> 

Wow that's a 5 year old version of git!