[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 24/52] sched/cpufreq: Fix 32-bit math overflow

[Sasha Levin]

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit a23314e9d88d89d49e69db08f60b7caa470f04e1 ]

Vincent Wang reported that get_next_freq() has a mult overflow bug on
32-bit platforms in the IOWAIT boost case, since in that case {util,max}
are in freq units instead of capacity units.

Solve this by moving the IOWAIT boost to capacity units. And since this
means @max is constant; simplify the code.

Reported-by: Vincent Wang <vincent.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Vincent Wang <vincent.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190305083202.GU32494@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 59 ++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 3fffad3bc8a8..217f81ecae17 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
 
 	bool			iowait_boost_pending;
 	unsigned int		iowait_boost;
-	unsigned int		iowait_boost_max;
 	u64			last_update;
 
 	unsigned long		bw_dl;
+	unsigned long		min;
 	unsigned long		max;
 
 	/* The field below is for single-CPU policies only: */
@@ -283,8 +283,7 @@ static bool sugov_iowait_reset(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
 	if (delta_ns <= TICK_NSEC)
 		return false;
 
-	sg_cpu->iowait_boost = set_iowait_boost
-		? sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->min : 0;
+	sg_cpu->iowait_boost = set_iowait_boost ? sg_cpu->min : 0;
 	sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = set_iowait_boost;
 
 	return true;
@@ -324,14 +323,13 @@ static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
 
 	/* Double the boost at each request */
 	if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost) {
-		sg_cpu->iowait_boost <<= 1;
-		if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost > sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max)
-			sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
+		sg_cpu->iowait_boost =
+			min_t(unsigned int, sg_cpu->iowait_boost << 1, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE);
 		return;
 	}
 
 	/* First wakeup after IO: start with minimum boost */
-	sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->min;
+	sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->min;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -353,47 +351,38 @@ static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
  * This mechanism is designed to boost high frequently IO waiting tasks, while
  * being more conservative on tasks which does sporadic IO operations.
  */
-static void sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
-			       unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max)
+static unsigned long sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
+					unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
 {
-	unsigned int boost_util, boost_max;
+	unsigned long boost;
 
 	/* No boost currently required */
 	if (!sg_cpu->iowait_boost)
-		return;
+		return util;
 
 	/* Reset boost if the CPU appears to have been idle enough */
 	if (sugov_iowait_reset(sg_cpu, time, false))
-		return;
+		return util;
 
-	/*
-	 * An IO waiting task has just woken up:
-	 * allow to further double the boost value
-	 */
-	if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending) {
-		sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
-	} else {
+	if (!sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending) {
 		/*
-		 * Otherwise: reduce the boost value and disable it when we
-		 * reach the minimum.
+		 * No boost pending; reduce the boost value.
 		 */
 		sg_cpu->iowait_boost >>= 1;
-		if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost < sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->min) {
+		if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost < sg_cpu->min) {
 			sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
-			return;
+			return util;
 		}
 	}
 
+	sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
+
 	/*
-	 * Apply the current boost value: a CPU is boosted only if its current
-	 * utilization is smaller then the current IO boost level.
+	 * @util is already in capacity scale; convert iowait_boost
+	 * into the same scale so we can compare.
 	 */
-	boost_util = sg_cpu->iowait_boost;
-	boost_max = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
-	if (*util * boost_max < *max * boost_util) {
-		*util = boost_util;
-		*max = boost_max;
-	}
+	boost = (sg_cpu->iowait_boost * max) >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+	return max(boost, util);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
@@ -440,7 +429,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 
 	util = sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
 	max = sg_cpu->max;
-	sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, &util, &max);
+	util = sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, util, max);
 	next_f = get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max);
 	/*
 	 * Do not reduce the frequency if the CPU has not been idle
@@ -480,7 +469,7 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 
 		j_util = sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
 		j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
-		sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time, &j_util, &j_max);
+		j_util = sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time, j_util, j_max);
 
 		if (j_util * max > j_max * util) {
 			util = j_util;
@@ -817,7 +806,9 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
 		sg_cpu->cpu			= cpu;
 		sg_cpu->sg_policy		= sg_policy;
-		sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max	= policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
+		sg_cpu->min			=
+			(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE * policy->cpuinfo.min_freq) /
+			policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
 	}
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) {
-- 
2.19.1