Re: [PATCH 1/3] rtc: tegra: set range

[Thierry Reding]

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 01:54:06PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 08/04/2019 12:22:49+0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 11:16:44PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > The Tegra 20 RTC is a 32bit seconds counter (with an unused millisecond
> > > counter).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
> > > index c6b0a99aa3a9..3f93a1f7abb5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
> > > @@ -306,6 +306,13 @@ static int __init tegra_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >  
> > >  	info->tegra_rtc_irq = ret;
> > >  
> > > +	info->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_dev))
> > > +		return PTR_ERR(info->rtc_dev);
> > > +
> > > +	info->rtc_dev->ops = &tegra_rtc_ops;
> > > +	info->rtc_dev->range_max = U32_MAX;
> > 
> > The placement of this new block seems somewhat arbitrary, but either
> > way:
> > 
> 
> Well, I needed it to be before the clk_prepare_enable call so it can
> just return and I thought it would be better to leave devm_clk_get close
> to that clk_prepare_enable call. I don't mind, I can respin with it
> placed somewhere else.

Don't bother. It's really just a cosmetic change and I couldn't tell you
a much better place without moving some other pieces around either. If
somebody really cares a lot, this can be done in a separate follow-up.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature