Re: [PATCH 4/7] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Direcly assign set_next_event workaround

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 08/04/2019 17:49, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When a given timer is affected by an erratum and requires an
> alternative implementation of set_next_event, we do a rather
> complicated dance to detect and call the workaround on each
> set_next_event call.
> 
> This is clearly idiotic, as we can perfectly detect whether
> this CPU requires a workaround while setting up the clock event
> device.
> 
> This only requires the CPU-specific detection to be done a bit
> earlier, and we can then safely override the set_next_event pointer
> if we have a workaround associated to that CPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>

Do you want me to take the patch ?

Otherwise:

Acked-by; Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog