Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] media: docs-rst: Document memory-to-memory video encoder interface

From: Nicolas Dufresne
Date: Mon Apr 15 2019 - 08:30:10 EST


Le lundi 15 avril 2019 Ã 17:56 +0900, Tomasz Figa a Ãcrit :
> > Sounds like we need something similar to the SOURCE_CHANGE event
> > mechanism if we want to allow dynamic bitrate control which would
> > require re-allocation of the capture buffer queue. (Or any other
> > runtime control on our encoders, which is really expected to be
> > supported these days).
>
> Sounds like it. Or we could just assume that one needs to stop both
> queues to do a resolution change, since most codes would anyway reset
> the stream (e.g. send PPS/SPS, etc. for H.264) to change the
> resolution. Not sure if that assumption always holds, though.

I think for resolution/profile/level changes you have a good point, as
you said, we need to start a new stream (new header, new IDR). Maybe
then we should simply require the driver to allocate enough buffer to
support the highest bitrate for the selected resoltion/profile/level?
Though, this could create situation where we waste a lot of memory. On
the other side, if you need to reallocate your buffers on bitrate
change, it might create a visible freeze.

Nicolas