Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: rework SIOCGSTAMP ioctl handling
From: Willem de Bruijn
Date: Wed Apr 17 2019 - 10:46:47 EST
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 4:38 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The SIOCGSTAMP/SIOCGSTAMPNS ioctl commands are implemented by many
> socket protocol handlers, and all of those end up calling the same
> sock_get_timestamp()/sock_get_timestampns() helper functions, which
> results in a lot of duplicate code.
>
> With the introduction of 64-bit time_t on 32-bit architectures, this
> gets worse, as we then need four different ioctl commands in each
> socket protocol implementation.
>
> To simplify that, let's add a new .gettstamp() operation in
> struct proto_ops, and move ioctl implementation into the common
> sock_ioctl()/compat_sock_ioctl_trans() functions that these all go
> through.
>
> We can reuse the sock_get_timestamp() implementation, but generalize
> it so it can deal with both native and compat mode, as well as
> timeval and timespec structures.
>
> Acked-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a038aDQQotzua_QtKGhq8O9n+rdiz2=WDCp82ys8eUT+A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: reworked to not break sparc64 support
>From the discussion of v1 I thought you planned to unconditionally
call sock_gettstamp() for all protocols, avoiding the need to plumb in
all these new callbacks?
That is more concise, though this closer to the existing behavior. So,
fine either way.