Re: [patch V2 01/29] tracing: Cleanup stack trace code

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:41:20 +0200
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > @@ -412,23 +404,20 @@ stack_trace_sysctl(struct ctl_table *tab
> >  		   void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> >  		   loff_t *ppos)
> >  {
> > -	int ret;
> > +	int ret, was_enabled;
> 
> One small nit. Could this be:
> 
> 	int was_enabled;
> 	int ret;
> 
> I prefer only joining variables that are related on the same line.
> Makes it look cleaner IMO.

If you wish so. To me it's waste of screen space :)

> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&stack_sysctl_mutex);
> > +	was_enabled = !!stack_tracer_enabled;
> >  
> 
> Bah, not sure why I didn't do it this way to begin with. I think I
> copied something else that couldn't do it this way for some reason and
> didn't put any brain power behind the copy. :-/ But that was back in
> 2008 so I blame it on being "young and stupid" ;-)

The young part is gone for sure :)

> Other then the above nit and removing the unneeded +1 in max_entries:

s/+1/-1/

Thanks,

	tglx