Re: kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:434!

From: Yang Yingliang
Date: Thu Apr 18 2019 - 22:42:30 EST




On 2019/4/19 10:04, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:50 PM Yang Yingliang
<yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2019/4/18 8:24, Casey Schaufler wrote:
On 4/17/2019 4:39 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
Since it looks like all three LSMs which implement the setprocattr
hook are vulnerable I'm open to the idea that proc_pid_attr_write() is
a better choice for the cred != read_cred check, but I would want to
make sure John and Casey are okay with that.

John?

Casey?
I'm fine with the change going into proc_pid_attr_write().
The cred != real_cred checking is not enough.

Consider this situation, when doing override, cred, real_cred and
new_cred are all same:

after override_creds() cred == real_cred == new1_cred
I'm sorry, you've lost me. After override_creds() returns
current->cred and current->real_cred are not going to be the same,
yes?
It's possible the new cred is equal to current->real_cred and current->cred,
so after overrides_creds(), they have the same value.

after prepare_creds() new2_cred
after commit_creds() becasue the check is false, so cred ==
real_cred == new2_cred
after revert_creds() cred == new1_cred, real_cred == new2_cred

It will cause cred != real_cred finally.