Re: [PATCH 5/7] thermal/drivers/core: Remove depends on THERMAL in Kconfig

[Amit Kucheria]

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:03 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> On 02/04/2019 20:51, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:14 PM Daniel Lezcano
> > <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> The dependency on the THERMAL option to be set is already there implicitly
> >> by the "if THERMAL" conditionnal option. The sub Kconfigs do not have to
> >> check against the THERMAL option as they are called from a Kconfig block
> >> which is enabled by the conditionnal option.
> >>
> >> Remove the useless "depends on THERMAL" in the Kconfigs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/thermal/Kconfig       | 2 --
> >>  drivers/thermal/intel/Kconfig | 1 -
> >>  drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig  | 1 -
> >>  3 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> >> index ccf5b9408d7a..d8aa7fac8c56 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> >> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ config THERMAL_STATISTICS
> >>
> >>  config THERMAL_EMERGENCY_POWEROFF_DELAY_MS
> >>         int "Emergency poweroff delay in milli-seconds"
> >> -       depends on THERMAL
> >>         default 0
> >>         help
> >>           Thermal subsystem will issue a graceful shutdown when
> >> @@ -152,7 +151,6 @@ config CPU_THERMAL
> >>         bool "generic cpu cooling support"
> >>         depends on CPU_FREQ
> >>         depends on THERMAL_OF
> >> -       depends on THERMAL=y
> >
> > This will break the intention of afa1f2ab43d48d0e1. At the moment, we
> > need THERMAL=y if we want cpu_cooling.
>
> The patch 1/7 changes the thermal option from tristate to bool, so the
> thermal is compiled-in always. The dependency is no longer needed in
> this case. Did I miss something?

Sorry, the threading of this series was a bit strange and there was no
cover letter. I wasn't cc'ed on the other patches, so missed the
earlier changes. This series looks good.

FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>