RE: [PATCH RFT] watchdog: da9063_wdt: parse DT for timeout value, too

[Steve Twiss]

Hi Geert,

Thanks.

On 24 April 2019 10:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] watchdog: da9063_wdt: parse DT for timeout value, too
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 12:10 PM Steve Twiss wrote:
> > On 15 April 2019 10:29, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 08:11:16AM +0000, Steve Twiss wrote:
> > > > On 14 April 2019 12:10, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Tested with a Renesas Lager board (R-Car H2, DA9063AD)
> > > >
> > > It is an early version of the Lager development board. I have no numbers
> > > but my assumption is there are not too many out there.
> >
> > Thanks, yes, there is interest from the hardware engineers here. Thanks for the
> > confirmation about your board. I will inform them about the DA9063 AD silicon on
> > the Renesas Lager board -- and I will let you know their response.
> 
> For the record, I see the following DA9063 variants on the Renesas boards I have
> access to:
>   - DA9063 AD: Lager (R-Car H2), Koelsch (R-Car M2-W),
>   - DA9063 BB: Gose (R-Car M2-N), Blanche (R-Car V2H), Alt (R-Car E2).
> 
> I cannot check Porter (R-Car M2-W) and Silk (R-Car E2) right now, but
> from Marek's report, Porter has DA9063L CA.
> 
> Marek: which variant does your Stout (R-Car H2) have?

Thanks for the hardware details. I re-iterated the info from Wolfram's last e-mail to the
hardware engineers during this morning's meeting. It can also be looked up on LKML if
needed. I will pass on the details you have sent, next.

To be clear -- I am treating these informal conversations on LKML as a data collection
exercise and for them to be used as information-only. But, I pushed-back again and asked for
any discussions to go through more formal channels and not to require me as a go-between,
or to include the involvement of individuals like yourselves, or to use the LKML channel.

This is not patch related and I don't want to request any more of anybody's time.

Regards,
Steve