Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Improve support for CPUs in genpd

[Ulf Hansson]

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 12:14, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:11 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 11:56, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Recently genpd was extended to cope with devices belonging to CPUs. However,
> > > > attaching CPU devices via genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id|name() doesn't work,
> > > > because of the virtual device that genpd allocates in this path.
> > > >
> > > > In this series, this limitation is addressed, together with a few other related
> > > > fixes/cleanups.
> > > >
> > > > Ulf Hansson (4):
> > > >   PM / Domains: Use the base device for
> > > >     driver_deferred_probe_check_state()
> > > >   PM / Domains: Drop unused in-parameter to some genpd functions
> > > >   PM / Domains: Search for the CPU device outside the genpd lock
> > > >   PM / Domains: Allow to attach a CPU via
> > > >     genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id|name()
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > >  include/linux/pm_domain.h   |  1 +
> > > >  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Are there any dependencies between this and the series you've recently posted?
> >
> > Yep. I should have stated that, sorry. This should be applied on top.
>
> On top of which series?

[PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Improve support for multi PM domains

and

[PATCH v13 0/4] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM)

Kind regards
Uffe