Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] selftests: Move test output to diagnostic lines

From: Kees Cook
Date: Thu Apr 25 2019 - 13:05:23 EST


On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 9:52 AM shuah <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 4/24/19 5:12 PM, wrote:
> > This refactors the selftest Makefiles to extract the test running logic
> > to be reused between "run_tests" and "emit_tests", while also fixing
> > up the test output to be TAP version 13 compliant:
> > - added "plan" line
> > - fixed result line syntax
> > - moved all test output to be "# "-prefixed as TAP "diagnostic" lines
> >
> > The prefixing code includes a fallback mode for limited execution
> > environments.
> >
> > Additionally, the plan lines are fixed for all callers of kselftest.h.
> >
> > -Kees
> >
>
> Kees,
>
> Just about to apply these to a topic branch to do testing and ran into
> checkpatch errors:
>
>
> WARNING: line over 80 characters - a few

I only saw one, which is on a string which kernel coding style says to
leave unsplit:

WARNING: line over 80 characters
#55: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh:19:
+ echo "$TEST_HDR_MSG: Warning: file $TEST is not
executable, correct this."

> WARNING: Misplaced SPDX-License-Identifier tag - use line 1 instead
> #141: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh:2:

WARNING: Misplaced SPDX-License-Identifier tag - use line 1 instead
#37: FILE: tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh:2:
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

This is a shell script. It can't be on line 1:

$ head -n3 tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh
#!/bin/sh
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#

That looks like a bug in checkpatch not resetting the expected line or
something.

> Can fix them and resend - SPDX one is my main concern.

These appear to be false positives; I don't think I need to fix them?
Let me know what you think.

> The plan is to apply these to linux-kselftest ksft-tap-refactor topic
> first. I don't want to rush these until we do some testing.

Absolutely. :)

Thanks!

--
Kees Cook