Re: [PATCH] irqchip/bcm: Restore registration print with %pOF

[Marc Zyngier]

On 26/04/2019 18:33, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 3/20/19 12:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> It is useful to print which interrupt controllers are registered in the
>> system and which parent IRQ they use, especially given that L2 interrupt
>> controllers do not call request_irq() on their parent interrupt and do
>> not appear under /proc/interrupts for that reason.
>>
>> We used to print the base register address virtual address which had
>> little value, use %pOF to print the path to the Device Tree node which
>> maps to the physical address more easily and is what people need to
>> troubleshoot systems.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Marc, are you okay with taking that patch?

I find it slightly pointless, but if you find it useful in the field,
fair enough. I've queued it for 5.2.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...