Re: [PATCH] rds: ib: force endiannes annotation

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 01:02:31PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> ... are some bitwise ops on the values (bitwise ops are legal in any
>  endianness) and incrementation of the pointers (which cares only about
>  the pointee size, not type).

Oh, true.  That is why the underlying annotation is called __bitwise :)
I'll take my previous comment back.