Re: [PATCH v8] Bluetooth: btqca: inject command complete event during fw download
From: Matthias Kaehlcke
Date: Mon Apr 29 2019 - 20:14:45 EST
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 05:10:24PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> From: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> From: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Latest qualcomm chips are not sending an command complete event for
> every firmware packet sent to chip. They only respond with a vendor
> specific event for the last firmware packet. This optimization will
> decrease the BT ON time. Due to this we are seeing a timeout error
> message logs on the console during firmware download. Now we are
> injecting a command complete event once we receive an vendor specific
> event for the last RAM firmware packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v8:
> - renamed QCA_HCI_CC_SUCCESS to QCA_HCI_CC_OPCODE
> - use 0xFC00 as opcode of the injected event instead of 0
> - added Matthias' tags from the v7 review
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> index cc12eecd9e4d..ef765ea881b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static void qca_tlv_check_data(struct rome_config *config,
> * In case VSE is skipped, only the last segment is acked.
> */
> config->dnld_mode = tlv_patch->download_mode;
> + config->dnld_type = config->dnld_mode;
>
> BT_DBG("Total Length : %d bytes",
> le32_to_cpu(tlv_patch->total_size));
> @@ -264,6 +265,31 @@ static int qca_tlv_send_segment(struct hci_dev *hdev, int seg_size,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int qca_inject_cmd_complete_event(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> +{
> + struct hci_event_hdr *hdr;
> + struct hci_ev_cmd_complete *evt;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> + skb = bt_skb_alloc(sizeof(*hdr) + sizeof(*evt) + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!skb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + hdr = skb_put(skb, sizeof(*hdr));
> + hdr->evt = HCI_EV_CMD_COMPLETE;
> + hdr->plen = sizeof(*evt) + 1;
> +
> + evt = skb_put(skb, sizeof(*evt));
> + evt->ncmd = 1;
> + evt->opcode = HCI_OP_NOP;
> +
> + skb_put_u8(skb, QCA_HCI_CC_SUCCESS);
> +
> + hci_skb_pkt_type(skb) = HCI_EVENT_PKT;
> +
> + return hci_recv_frame(hdev, skb);
> +}
> +
> static int qca_download_firmware(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> struct rome_config *config)
> {
> @@ -297,11 +323,22 @@ static int qca_download_firmware(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> ret = qca_tlv_send_segment(hdev, segsize, segment,
> config->dnld_mode);
> if (ret)
> - break;
> + goto out;
>
> segment += segsize;
> }
>
> + /* Latest qualcomm chipsets are not sending a command complete event
> + * for every fw packet sent. They only respond with a vendor specific
> + * event for the last packet. This optimization in the chip will
> + * decrease the BT in initialization time. Here we will inject a command
> + * complete event to avoid a command timeout error message.
> + */
> + if ((config->dnld_type == ROME_SKIP_EVT_VSE_CC ||
> + config->dnld_type == ROME_SKIP_EVT_VSE))
> + return qca_inject_cmd_complete_event(hdev);
> +
> +out:
> release_firmware(fw);
>
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> index 4c4fe2b5b7b7..595abcdaed2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
> #define QCA_WCN3990_POWERON_PULSE 0xFC
> #define QCA_WCN3990_POWEROFF_PULSE 0xC0
>
> +#define QCA_HCI_CC_OPCODE 0xFC00
> +
> enum qca_baudrate {
> QCA_BAUDRATE_115200 = 0,
> QCA_BAUDRATE_57600,
> @@ -82,6 +84,7 @@ struct rome_config {
> char fwname[64];
> uint8_t user_baud_rate;
> enum rome_tlv_dnld_mode dnld_mode;
> + enum rome_tlv_dnld_mode dnld_type;
> };
>
> struct edl_event_hdr {
In the v7 review (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1028118/) 3
months ago Marcel said he isn't convinced that this solution is
needed, but didn't follow up on the discussion, so this is the best we
have at the moment. Let's please drive it towards a solution.
Thanks
Matthias