Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: usb: dwc2: Document quirk to reset PHY upon wakeup

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:54 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 02:53:48PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > On Rockchip rk3288 there's a hardware quirk where we need to assert
> > the reset signal to the PHY when we get a remote wakeup on one of the
> > two ports.  Document this quirk in the bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2: None
> >
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt
> > index 6dc3c4a34483..f70f3aee4bfc 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc2.txt
> > @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ Refer to phy/phy-bindings.txt for generic phy consumer properties
> >  - g-rx-fifo-size: size of rx fifo size in gadget mode.
> >  - g-np-tx-fifo-size: size of non-periodic tx fifo size in gadget mode.
> >  - g-tx-fifo-size: size of periodic tx fifo per endpoint (except ep0) in gadget mode.
> > +- snps,reset-phy-on-wake: If present indicates that we need to reset the PHY when
> > +                          we detect a wakeup.  This is due to a hardware errata.
>
> Synopsys or Rockchip errata?
>
> Ideally, this should be implied by the controller or phy compatible.

I have no idea.  The errata was described to me by Rockchip but I
don't know if it's common to more than one board.

You're right that we could do it on the controller compatible, but we
have to be careful.  The two ports on rk3288 currently have the same
compatible string but the errata only applies to one of them.  ...so
I'd have to cue on not just the compatible string but also detect
whether we're on the "OTG" port of the "host only" port.  That's not
too hard, though since it is probe-able.

I'm happy to spin this but I'll wait to hear from Felipe.  This is
already in his testing tree, so presumably I should do a follow-up
patch.  ...but if he wants me to re-post I can do that too.


-Doug