Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] backlight: lm3630a: return 0 on success in update_status functions

From: Brian Masney
Date: Thu May 02 2019 - 06:43:01 EST

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:07:51AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 24/04/2019 10:25, Brian Masney wrote:
> > lm3630a_bank_a_update_status() and lm3630a_bank_b_update_status()
> > both return the brightness value if the brightness was successfully
> > updated. Writing to these attributes via sysfs would cause a 'Bad
> > address' error to be returned. These functions should return 0 on
> > success, so let's change it to correct that error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 28e64a68a2ef ("backlight: lm3630: apply chip revision")
> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
> Hi Brian, sorry for the delay. For some reason your mails are being dumped
> before they reach me so I only discovered these patches when I paid proper
> attention to the replies and fetched them from patchwork.
> Hi Lee, is the same thing happening for you? ;-)

Huh, that's odd. I haven't ran into that issue when working with people
from Linaro in other subsystems.

As a sanity check, I used 'git send-email' to send this patch to
check-auth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and it verified that I still have SPF,
DKIM, reverse DNS, etc. all setup properly on this domain. addresses are the only ones I've had issues with in the
past, but I doubt you're forwarding your email there. :)