Re: [PATCH-tip v7 08/20] locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation

From: Waiman Long
Date: Fri May 03 2019 - 09:58:19 EST


On 5/3/19 9:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 05:25:45PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> +static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem,
>> + enum writer_wait_state wstate)
>> {
>> long new;
>>
>> + lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);
>> + do {
>> + bool has_handoff = !!(count & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF);
>>
>> + if (has_handoff && wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST)
>> + return false;
>>
>> + if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) {
>> + if (has_handoff || (wstate != WRITER_HANDOFF))
>> + return false;
>> + new = count | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
>> + } else {
>> + new = (count | RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED) &
>> + ~RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
>>
>> + if (list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list))
>> + new &= ~RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;
>> + }
>> + } while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &count, new));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * We have either acquired the lock with handoff bit cleared or
>> + * set the handoff bit.
>> + */
>> + if (new & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + rwsem_set_owner(sem);
>> + return true;
>> }
> I've changed that like so.
>
> --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
> @@ -406,19 +406,23 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(
> long new;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);
> +
> do {
> bool has_handoff = !!(count & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF);
>
> if (has_handoff && wstate == WRITER_NOT_FIRST)
> return false;
>
> + new = count;
> +
> if (count & RWSEM_LOCK_MASK) {
> if (has_handoff || (wstate != WRITER_HANDOFF))
> return false;
> - new = count | RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
> +
> + new |= RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
> } else {
> - new = (count | RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED) &
> - ~RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
> + new |= RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED;
> + new &= ~RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF;
>
> if (list_is_singular(&sem->wait_list))
> new &= ~RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS;

Will the apply the changes in the next version.

Thanks,
Longman