Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
From: Josh Poimboeuf
Date: Tue May 07 2019 - 16:03:48 EST
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 03:58:17PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2019 14:49:25 -0500
> Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > New version:
> > >
> > > x86_64: Allow breakpoints to emulate call functions
> > >
> > > In order to allow breakpoints to emulate call functions, they need to push
> >
> > Sorry to keep nitpicking, but "call functions" -> "function calls" would
> > sound more accurate to me (in both subject and description).
>
> I disagree ;-)
>
> Matters how you look at it. I look at it as emulating the "call"
> function, not a function call. Like emulating an "addl" function, or a
> "jmp" function.
>
> See?
I kind of see your point... but then you're overloading the meaning of
the word "function", in a context where it clearly means something else.
> To remove the ambiguity, I could replace "function" with "instruction".
Yes, that would be much better :-)
--
Josh