Would a vendor also be allowed to provide a string expressing required features as well as containing backend resource requirements which need to be compatible for a successful migration? Somehow a bit like a cpu model... maybe even as json or xml...It's a vendor defined string, it should be considered opaque to theI thought there was a request to make this more specific to migrationso this attribute may not only include a mdev device's parent device info and
by renaming it to something like migration_version. Also, as an
mdev type, but also include numeric software version of vendor specific
migration code, right?
user, the vendor can include whatever they feel is relevant.