Re: [PATCH] kernel/panic: Use SYSTEM_RESET2 command for warm reset

From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Thu May 09 2019 - 05:42:02 EST


On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:47:12PM -0700, Prasad Sodagudi wrote:
> Some platforms may need warm reboot support when kernel crashed
> for post mortem analysis instead of cold reboot. So use config
> CONFIG_WARM_REBOOT_ON_PANIC and SYSTEM_RESET2 psci command
> support for warm reset.
>

Please drop all the references to PSCI and SYSTEM_RESET2 including
in subject. This is more generic and PSCIv1.1 with SYSTEM_RESET2 can
make use of it.

> Signed-off-by: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/panic.c | 4 ++++
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> index c1fcaad..6ab6675 100644
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...)
>
> console_verbose();
> bust_spinlocks(1);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_WARM_REBOOT_ON_PANIC
> + /* Configure for warm reboot instead of cold reboot. */
> + reboot_mode = REBOOT_WARM;
> +#endif
> va_start(args, fmt);
> len = vscnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), fmt, args);
> va_end(args);
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index d695ec1..2a727d8 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -1000,6 +1000,16 @@ config PANIC_TIMEOUT
> value n > 0 will wait n seconds before rebooting, while a timeout
> value n < 0 will reboot immediately.
>
> +config WARM_REBOOT_ON_PANIC
> + bool "Warm reboot instead of cold reboot for panic"
> + default n
> + help
> + Some vendor platform may need warm reboot instead of cold reboot
> + for debugging. Before vendor specific power off driver is
> + probed, platform always gets cold reset. By setting Y here and
> + support for PSCI V1.1 is present from firmware, platform would
> + get warm reset instead of cold reset.
> +

Ditto here, drop PSCI reference. Since it's being pushed as generic
solution, expecting anyone reading this to understand what is this PSCI
makes no sense and may be even confusing.

--
Regards,
Sudeep