Re: [PATCH 03/10] PCI/DPC: Log messages with pci_dev, not pcie_device

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Thu May 09 2019 - 17:20:15 EST


On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 08:39:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:18 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Log messages with pci_dev, not pcie_device. Factor out common message
> > prefixes with dev_fmt().
> >
> > Example output change:
> >
> > - dpc 0000:00:01.1:pcie008: DPC error containment capabilities...
> > + pcieport 0000:00:01.1: DPC: error containment capabilities...
>
> Overall same question about Capitalizing sentences.

I think that consistency would be nice. But I'm not sure whether the
consensus is capitalize or not, and I would want to do all of
drivers/pci in a single patch so there's a clear precedent to follow,
so I think that's slightly out of scope for this series.

> > + pci_err(pdev, "rp_pio_status: %#010x, rp_pio_mask: %#010x\n",
>
> And here perhaps RP PIO status: ... mask: ... ?
> See below I left examples from this patch.

Same thing here. I noticed this as well, but didn't want to pollute
these patches with other cleanups that were not really related, so
this could be done in the future. But I certainly agree it's weird to
have "rp_pio_status:" and "RP PIO severity=".

> > status, mask);
>
> > + pci_err(pdev, "RP PIO severity=%#010x, syserror=%#010x, exception=%#010x\n",
> > sev, syserr, exc);
>
> > + pci_err(pdev, "RP PIO ImpSpec Log %#010x\n", log);
>
> > + pci_err(pdev, "RP PIO log size %u is invalid\n",
> > dpc->rp_log_size);
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko