Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Explain the kobject_put() in cpufreq_policy_alloc()

[Viresh Kumar]

On 10-05-19, 12:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It may not be particularly clear why the kobject_put() after
> failing kobject_init_and_add() in cpufreq_policy_alloc() is not
> redundant, so add a comment to explain that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |    5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1133,6 +1133,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_po
>  				   cpufreq_global_kobject, "policy%u", cpu);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		pr_err("%s: failed to init policy->kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +		/*
> +		 * The entire policy object will be freed below, but the extra
> +		 * memory allocated for the kobject name needs to be freed by
> +		 * releasing the kobject.
> +		 */
>  		kobject_put(&policy->kobj);
>  		goto err_free_real_cpus;
>  	}

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh