Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] binfmt_*: scope path resolution of interpreters

[Aleksa Sarai]

On 2019-05-12, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2019-05-12, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 7:37 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I bet this will break something that already exists. An execveat()
> > > flag to turn off /proc/self/exe would do the trick, though.
> > 
> > Thinking more about it, I suspect it is (once again) wrong to let the
> > thing that does the execve() control that bit.
> > 
> > Generally, the less we allow people to affect the lifetime and
> > environment of a suid executable, the better off we are.
> > 
> > But maybe we could limit /proc/*/exe to at least not honor suid'ness
> > of the target? Or does chrome/runc depend on that too?
> 
> Speaking on the runc side, we don't depend on this. It's possible
> someone depends on this for fexecve(3) -- but as mentioned before in
> newer kernels glibc uses execve(AT_EMPTY_PATH).
> 
> I would like to point out though that I'm a little bit cautious about
> /proc/self/exe-specific restrictions -- because a trivial way to get
> around them would be to just open it with O_PATH (and you end up with a
> /proc/self/fd/ which is equivalent). Unfortunately blocking setuid exec
> on all O_PATH descriptors would break even execve(AT_EMPTY_PATH) of
> setuid descriptors.
> 
> The patches I mentioned (which Andy and I discussed off-list) would
> effectively make the magiclink modes in /proc/ affect how you can
> operate on the path (no write bit in the mode, cannot re-open it write).
> One aspect of this is how to handle O_PATH and in particular how do we
> handle an O_PATH re-open of an already-restricted magiclink.
> 
> Maybe we could make it so that setuid is disallowed if you are dealing
> with an O_PATH fd which was a magiclink. Effectively, on O_PATH open you
> get an fmode_t saying FMODE_SETUID_EXEC_ALLOWED *but* if the path is a
> magiclink this fmode gets dropped and when the fd is given to
> execveat(AT_EMPTY_PATH) the fmode is checked and setuid-exec is not
> allowed.

... and obviously /proc/self/exe would have an fmode
~FMODE_SETUID_EXEC_ALLOWED from the outset. The reason for this slightly
odd semantic would be to continue to allow O_PATH setuid-exec as long as
the O_PATH was opened from an actual path rather than a magiclink.

-- 
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature