Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/3] perf, tools: Add support for recording and printing XMM registers
From: Liang, Kan
Date: Mon May 13 2019 - 17:29:36 EST
On 5/13/2019 2:37 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:37:16PM -0400, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Mon, May 06, 2019 at 07:19:24AM -0700, kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx escreveu:
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Icelake and later platforms support collecting XMM registers with PEBS
event.
Add support for perf script to dump them, and support
for the register parser in perf record -I ... to configure them.
For now they are just printed in hex, could potentially add
other formats too.
So I noticed the sync warning about
tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h abd added a separate patch
for that, removing this part from this patch, applying it afterward.
Also, when using 'perf record -I foobar' it should record all registers,
which I think includes the xmm registers in capable platforms, from your
'Add perf script support to dump them', so I tried running it here on a
skylake notebook, i.e. where it fails when I ask for a specific xmm
register:
# perf record -Isi,di,xmm0 sleep 1
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (cycles).
/bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.
# perf record -I?
available registers: AX BX CX DX SI DI BP SP IP FLAGS CS SS R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 XMM0 XMM1 XMM2 XMM3 XMM4 XMM5 XMM6 XMM7 XMM8 XMM9 XMM10 XMM11 XMM12 XMM13 XMM14 XMM15
Usage: perf record [<options>] [<command>]
or: perf record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
-I, --intr-regs[=<any register>]
sample selected machine registers on interrupt, use -I ? to list register names
#
But when I try asking for all those "available" registers, it doesn't
seem to ask for the xmm registers, i.e. it works:
[root@quaco ~]# perf record -I
^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 1.812 MB perf.data (2036 samples) ]
# perf evlist -v
cycles: size: 112, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|CPU|PERIOD|REGS_INTR, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, freq: 1, task: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1, sample_regs_intr: 0xff0fff
#
# perf script -F uregs
Samples for 'cycles' event do not have UREGS attribute set. Cannot print 'uregs' field.
# perf script -F iregs | head -1
ABI:2 AX:0xf BX:0xffff9edc4620f3a0 CX:0x38f DX:0x7 SI:0xf DI:0x38f BP:0x0 SP:0xffff9edc46203f68 IP:0xffffffffae069894 FLAGS:0xa CS:0x10 SS:0x18 R8:0x0 R9:0x207c0 R10:0x7968cfe8776 R11:0x5 R12:0x0 R13:0xffffbaec16fb7d20 R14:0xffff9edc2b5ab000 R15:0x0
#
So, can you please check all this and please consider sending a fix that
comes with output for the steps used to test it, like above.
I'm applying this now because it adds a ability that, used with the
above caveats in mind, is useful, but please help improving the output
so that users don't get confused.
For instance, the 'perf record -I?' code should probe for the existence
of these registers in the combo kernel+hardware, by creating an event,
asking the kernel to record those registers and checking if the kernel
supports this and the hardware has such registers.
Thanks for the test. I will send a fix for the issue.
Thanks,
Kan
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
- Arnaldo
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-
tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++--
tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 16 +++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f3329cabce5c..ac67bbea10ca 100644
--- a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -27,8 +27,29 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
PERF_REG_X86_R13,
PERF_REG_X86_R14,
PERF_REG_X86_R15,
-
+ /* These are the limits for the GPRs. */
PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
+
+ /* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit */
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 = 32,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM1 = 34,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM2 = 36,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM3 = 38,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM4 = 40,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM5 = 42,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM6 = 44,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM7 = 46,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM8 = 48,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM9 = 50,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM10 = 52,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM11 = 54,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM12 = 56,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM13 = 58,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM14 = 60,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM15 = 62,
+
+ /* These include both GPRs and XMMX registers */
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_XMM15 + 2,
};
#endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h
index 7f6d538f8a89..b7321337d100 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@
void perf_regs_load(u64 *regs);
+#define PERF_REGS_MAX PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_X86_64_SUPPORT
#define PERF_REGS_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX) - 1)
-#define PERF_REGS_MAX PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX
#define PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32
#else
#define REG_NOSUPPORT ((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_DS) | \
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ void perf_regs_load(u64 *regs);
(1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_FS) | \
(1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_GS))
#define PERF_REGS_MASK (((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX) - 1) & ~REG_NOSUPPORT)
-#define PERF_REGS_MAX PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX
#define PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64
#endif
#define PERF_REG_IP PERF_REG_X86_IP
@@ -77,6 +76,28 @@ static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
case PERF_REG_X86_R15:
return "R15";
#endif /* HAVE_ARCH_X86_64_SUPPORT */
+
+#define XMM(x) \
+ case PERF_REG_X86_XMM ## x: \
+ case PERF_REG_X86_XMM ## x + 1: \
+ return "XMM" #x;
+ XMM(0)
+ XMM(1)
+ XMM(2)
+ XMM(3)
+ XMM(4)
+ XMM(5)
+ XMM(6)
+ XMM(7)
+ XMM(8)
+ XMM(9)
+ XMM(10)
+ XMM(11)
+ XMM(12)
+ XMM(13)
+ XMM(14)
+ XMM(15)
+#undef XMM
default:
return NULL;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
index fead6b3b4206..71d7604dbf0b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -31,6 +31,22 @@ const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(R14, PERF_REG_X86_R14),
SMPL_REG(R15, PERF_REG_X86_R15),
#endif
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM0, PERF_REG_X86_XMM0),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM1, PERF_REG_X86_XMM1),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM2, PERF_REG_X86_XMM2),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM3, PERF_REG_X86_XMM3),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM4, PERF_REG_X86_XMM4),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM5, PERF_REG_X86_XMM5),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM6, PERF_REG_X86_XMM6),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM7, PERF_REG_X86_XMM7),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM8, PERF_REG_X86_XMM8),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM9, PERF_REG_X86_XMM9),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM10, PERF_REG_X86_XMM10),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM11, PERF_REG_X86_XMM11),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM12, PERF_REG_X86_XMM12),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM13, PERF_REG_X86_XMM13),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM14, PERF_REG_X86_XMM14),
+ SMPL_REG2(XMM15, PERF_REG_X86_XMM15),
SMPL_REG_END
};
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
index c9319f8d17a6..1a15a4bfc28d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ struct sample_reg {
uint64_t mask;
};
#define SMPL_REG(n, b) { .name = #n, .mask = 1ULL << (b) }
+#define SMPL_REG2(n, b) { .name = #n, .mask = 3ULL << (b) }
#define SMPL_REG_END { .name = NULL }
extern const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[];
--
2.17.1
--
- Arnaldo