Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: bridge: dw-hdmi: Add hooks for suspend/resume

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:58 AM Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 03:38:07PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > On Rockchip rk3288-based Chromebooks when you do a suspend/resume
> > cycle:
> >
> > 1. You lose the ability to detect an HDMI device being plugged in.
> >
> > 2. If you're using the i2c bus built in to dw_hdmi then it stops
> > working.
> >
> > Let's add a hook to the core dw-hdmi driver so that we can call it in
> > dw_hdmi-rockchip in the next commit.
> >
> > NOTE: the exact set of steps I've done here in resume come from
> > looking at the normal dw_hdmi init sequence in upstream Linux plus the
> > sequence that we did in downstream Chrome OS 3.14.  Testing show that
> > it seems to work, but if an extra step is needed or something here is
> > not needed we could improve it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.h              |  3 +++
> >  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
> > index db761329a1e3..4b38bfd43e59 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-hdmi.c
> > @@ -2780,6 +2780,27 @@ void dw_hdmi_unbind(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_hdmi_unbind);
> >
> > +int dw_hdmi_suspend(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi)
> > +{
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_hdmi_suspend);
> > +
> > +int dw_hdmi_resume(struct dw_hdmi *hdmi)
> > +{
> > +     initialize_hdmi_ih_mutes(hdmi);
> > +
> > +     dw_hdmi_setup_i2c(hdmi);
> > +     if (hdmi->i2c)
> > +             dw_hdmi_i2c_init(hdmi);
> > +
> > +     if (hdmi->phy.ops->setup_hpd)
> > +             hdmi->phy.ops->setup_hpd(hdmi, hdmi->phy.data);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_hdmi_resume);
>
> Both patches look good to me, I'd probably prefer to just smash them together,
> but meh.
>
> If no one more authoritative chimes in, I'll apply them to -misc in a few days.

Sure.  I can smash them and re-post or you can smash them for me or we
can keep them as-is.  I originally separated because I wasn't sure if
they'd eventually go through different trees.  Just let me know!  :-)

-Doug